Mark Zuckerberg recently faced questions in a Washington, DC courtroom about his decision to acquire WhatsApp for a staggering $19 billion in 2014. When asked if he would make the same choice again, he smiled and confidently answered, “I’d do it again.”
Over the years, WhatsApp and Instagram have propelled Meta to soar as one of the most influential companies globally. Now, the U.S. government, through the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), is challenging these acquisitions in an antitrust lawsuit that began on April 14. During the proceedings, Zuckerberg spent about 13 hours answering complex questions from FTC lawyers.
One key issue is whether he purchased WhatsApp to eliminate competition. The FTC argues that he feared messaging apps might evolve into social networks themselves. In his defense, Zuckerberg mentioned that he considered this possibility but felt it was “extremely unlikely” after meeting WhatsApp’s founders, Jan Koum and Brian Acton, who showed little interest in advertising or social media growth.
He noted that both Koum and Acton had a strong disdain for social media, which led Zuckerberg to encourage the addition of new features to WhatsApp, like Stories. In one internal email, he even described Koum as “unambitious” prior to the acquisition.
Zuckerberg believes the rise of WhatsApp was pivotal as communication shifted from public platforms like Facebook to private messages. He wanted to secure WhatsApp as a valuable asset, not just to outmaneuver rivals like Apple and Google but also to better adapt to changing user preferences. He expressed concerns about those companies having control over app distributions and hoped acquiring WhatsApp would strengthen his negotiating position.
According to internal documents, Facebook estimated WhatsApp would reach 2 billion users by 2024. However, Zuckerberg revealed in court that the app has nearly achieved that milestone today, with close to 3 billion users. WhatsApp generates approximately $10 billion annually from ads linking users to businesses on its platforms.
Instagram’s journey has been equally remarkable. Initially, Zuckerberg wasn’t concerned about Instagram until it hit 1 billion users. Afterward, fearing Instagram would pull users from Facebook, he urged the team to reduce Facebook-related traffic strategies. However, this did not sit well with Instagram’s co-founders, Kevin Systrom and Mike Krieger, both of whom left the company soon after.
When Zuckerberg acquired Instagram, it had about 10 million users. He aimed for it to reach 100 million, and now it has over 2 billion. His investments in both WhatsApp and Instagram appear to have exceeded his original expectations.
Zuckerberg’s testimony conveys that both acquisitions were strategic investments rather than attempts to crush competition, which the FTC alleges. Ex-COO Sheryl Sandberg also testified and reflected on their Instagram purchase, admitting she initially felt they paid “way too much.” Yet she remarked, "I think I was wrong. Like, very wrong."
This ongoing trial illustrates a complex interplay between innovation, competition, and regulatory scrutiny in the tech industry. As public discourse evolves around privacy and competition, the outcomes of such cases will have lasting implications for how big tech operates.
For further insights on this evolving story, you may refer to sources such as Bloomberg and the FTC website.
Source link
Meta,Policy,Tech