Tens of thousands of supporters of Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic rallied in Belgrade recently, following several months of unrest. A monitoring group estimated that about 55,000 people turned out in front of the National Assembly, although this was notably less than the massive anti-government protests held last month.
The unrest in Serbia escalated after a tragic incident last November, when a railway station canopy in Novi Sad collapsed, causing the deaths of 15 people. Many citizens linked this disaster to corruption and neglect by Vucic’s Progressive Party.
At the rally, Vucic framed the event as the start of a “Movement for the People and the State,” claiming it would protect Serbia from threats aimed at destabilizing the nation. During his speech, he urged prosecutors to act decisively, labeling the ongoing student-led protests as dangerous. He suggested that foreign intelligence agencies might be funding protesters, though he did not name anyone specifically.
Vucic has been under increasing pressure due to a perception that corruption has tainted his administration. The government’s handling of major infrastructure projects has faced extensive criticism, with protesters using slogans like “corruption kills.” This calls attention to public safety issues surrounding the government’s processes for awarding contracts.
Earlier demonstrations saw record attendance, with reports estimating up to 325,000 people gathered in Belgrade last month, making it possibly the largest protest in Serbia’s history. These movements reflect a significant shift in public sentiment, as many people express frustration with the government’s actions.
Interestingly, a recent survey indicated that approximately 70% of Serbians feel that corruption is the country’s biggest problem, highlighting widespread discontent. In contrast, Vucic continues to assure supporters that he remains committed to leading Serbia towards stability, despite growing dissent.
Vucic’s remarks about foreign interference suggest a narrative that positions his administration against an exterior threat, an approach some experts argue is a common tactic among leaders facing internal challenges. Critics and supporters alike are watching closely as Serbia navigates this turbulent period.
Source link