I’ve been wearing the Meta Ray-Ban Display glasses for over a week now, and I have mixed feelings about them. First off, they are definitely chunky. I’ve worn them everywhere—from the bus to the office—and I always felt a bit odd with their thick frames.
However, they do offer some amazing features. The built-in display helps me check my phone less often. Plus, the neural band feels innovative, offering surprising accuracy in gesture controls. This tech is exciting, but it’s clear that it’s still in its early stages.
The design is a significant drawback. The frames are thick due to the components needed for the display. At about 69 grams, they’re heavier than most glasses. While I got used to it over time, I felt discomfort after several hours of continuous wear, especially since they kept sliding down my nose. They’re not practical for activities like jogging or biking.
User Reactions
When I wear these glasses in public, people often react with awe when the display activates. “Whoa,” is a common response. But, when they see the glasses without the display, the compliments are scarce. Many find the look a bit strange, which makes me a bit self-conscious.
Display Quality
The monocular display is bright and has a decent resolution, but it doesn’t provide an immersive experience. You can interact through three simple menus that include a home screen, app launcher, and settings. Currently, the display supports a limited number of apps like Instagram and WhatsApp.
One feature I particularly enjoyed was checking Instagram DMs and viewing media from my family group chats on WhatsApp without pulling out my phone. It feels rewarding to see notifications instantly.
However, the display also has limitations. Text messages can be inconsistent, and the frames don’t support many apps yet. It’s a work in progress.
The Neural Band
The glasses use a neural band for gesture control, which works surprisingly well. It recognizes gestures without much fuss. Yet, the band requires a snug fit, making it somewhat uncomfortable for extended wear.
Battery life is another issue. While it’s rated for about six hours, heavy use can drain it quickly. I also found myself charging the case almost daily, which was unexpected.
Concerns About Privacy
Many people have raised concerns regarding privacy with these glasses. Meta’s policy hasn’t changed much; the glasses do not include facial recognition, but they still collect data similar to Meta’s other devices. The LED indicator lights up when the camera is on, adding a layer of transparency.
Final Thoughts
In short, I’m not sure these glasses are worth the $800 price tag just yet. They’re bulky, and while they have interesting tech, the limitations are noticeable. For most people, the standard Ray-Ban glasses would likely be more appealing.
That said, if you’re heavily invested in smart glasses and can overlook the thick design, these could be worth it. Meta is also continuously working on updates, promising future features that could improve the experience even more.
For more information, you can check out the official Meta site here.
Source link
smart glasses, Meta
