Craig DeLuz, an ambassador for Project 21, raises an important question about our climate policies: Are these measures helping the environment or just limiting our freedom? He believes it’s time to rethink our approach to energy and environmental regulations, focusing on practical solutions rather than fear.
The EPA recently reversed its 2009 finding on greenhouse gas emissions, signaling a shift in environmental regulation. The Clean Air Act, created in the 1970s for clear pollutants like sulfur dioxide, has been stretched to include carbon dioxide. This shift suggests a growing tendency for government overreach, as agencies extend their power into areas they may not be equipped to regulate effectively.
For example, regulating carbon dioxide, a natural byproduct of life, raises concerns about how we view environmental threats. Seeing carbon dioxide as an existential threat might divert attention from serious environmental stewardship. Economic burdens are another significant concern—regulations on greenhouse gases could cost us over $54 billion annually, leading to inefficient use of our resources.
The Biden administration’s recent focus on climate change over broader energy innovation reveals a trend. The cost of these environmental policies, totaling more than $800 billion over 15 years, suggests we may be missing the mark. Resources could be better invested in technological advancements and sustainable practices rather than strict compliance measures.
As the EPA seeks clearer legislative guidance on environmental power, a rational and data-driven discussion on climate change is needed. Reports from the Department of Energy indicate that climate change is not the sole cause of extreme weather. We should consider practical, economically sensible solutions that benefit everyone rather than have regulations that stifle innovation.
The crucial question we face is about our future. Do we opt for a future where a few dictate what behavior is acceptable under environmental pretenses, or do we embrace diverse energy sources like nuclear and natural gas that can lead to sustainability without harming our economy?
Ultimately, as we discuss energy policy, it’s vital to question whether our climate actions truly enhance the environment or just limit our freedoms. We need to bring common sense back into this dialogue, balancing historical lessons with scientific and economic realities. Let’s strive for a future driven by understanding, practicality, and the desire for prosperity.
Craig DeLuz has nearly 30 years of experience in public policy. He also runs a daily commentary show called The RUNDOWN. You can follow him on X at @CraigDeLuz. This article was first published at Sacramento Daily Press.
Source link
conservative, constitution, liberty, right, policy, politics, libertarian, ObamaCare, health care, Medicare, spending, climate, government,taxes, Medicare, Social Security, global warming, corporate cronyism, crony capitalism, black conservative, african-american
