There’s an interesting twist in the story of Lloyd Howell’s short time as the NFL Players Association (NFLPA) executive director. When Howell was chosen, the process was shrouded in secrecy. The players didn’t know who the candidates were, and even those in the player representative board were left in the dark until the meeting.
Now that Howell’s tenure is over—often compared to a failed adventure—many who stayed quiet during the selection are suddenly speaking up. The discussion began with JC Tretter, the former NFLPA president, who opened up about the hiring in an interview with CBS Sports. He revealed that the executive committee didn’t favor Howell; they actually voted 10-1 for another candidate, David White. What’s striking is that Tretter previously kept this information to himself.
Tretter’s comments carry a “don’t blame me” attitude, distancing himself from Howell and suggesting the blame lies with the player representatives. He argued that his preference was for someone with labor experience, something Howell lacked.
Adding to the intrigue, a source told CBS Sports that the executive committee should have given a clear recommendation instead of just handing over a binder of information for players to review. This hints at a lack of engagement from player representatives when it came to making a critical decision.
Tretter’s comments raise some questions. Did he feel cornered after learning about possible negative reports regarding Howell? His proactive statements might suggest he wanted to control the narrative before a potentially damaging report emerged.
A recent survey by Nielsen found that nearly 75% of athletes want transparency in leadership decisions. This reflects a growing concern among players about who represents them and the processes involved.
In this situation, the takeaway is clear: transparency and communication are vital in any organization. Whether or not mistakes were made, players are now calling for better engagement in decision-making to prevent a repeat of this scenario.