The recent interaction between an Indian diplomat and a Norwegian journalist during Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Oslo has sparked discussions worldwide about trust, press freedom, and human rights in India. The journalist’s straightforward questions—“Why should we trust you?” and “Why doesn’t the Indian Prime Minister take questions from the press?”—hit a nerve.
While the diplomat’s response might have seemed strong, it opens up a broader conversation beyond just social media reactions.
Firstly, let’s think about the nature of international relations. It’s not just about trust or shared values. These relationships are built on interests and the need for stability. Countries engage based on the need to coexist, not out of blind trust.
Interestingly, many Western countries that criticize India for not living up to democratic ideals often face their own contradictions. A recent survey by Pew Research indicates that trust in government among citizens in several Western nations is at a historic low, revealing a gap between stated values and public perception. This disparity raises questions about their credibility in lecturing others. In today’s complex global landscape, many in the Global South feel that power dynamics favor might over right.
India’s democratic journey deserves a thoughtful look. It didn’t emerge as a modern state by chance; instead, it’s a civilizational entity that arose from colonial struggles, rooted in a drive for democracy and pluralism. Even with its enormous diversity—1.4 billion people with a multitude of languages and cultures—India has maintained both its democratic values and societal integrity.
The protections for human rights and democracy in India are explicitly stated in its Constitution. Every citizen, no matter their background, has access to justice and a voice in governance. However, this is often missed in simplistic narratives pushed by selective reports.
Moreover, India’s economic growth paints a different picture. Over the last decade, more than 600 million people have been lifted from poverty due to various welfare programs and digital initiatives. Notably, assistance is provided without regard to religion or caste. This inclusivity is a vital part of India’s welfare system.
Social mobility is evident too. Influential figures in India come from diverse backgrounds, showcasing a society that values talent over religion. For example, Bollywood features artists from a variety of faiths, with fanbases larger than many nations. This cultural intersection reflects a society that, contrary to claims of exclusion, embraces its diversity.
Democracies thrive when they can discuss and critique themselves openly. The questions about media access and political communication in India are valid. A more nuanced response from the Indian side could have highlighted its democratic integrity and the accomplishments of the global Indian diaspora. Many Indians abroad have thrived in various sectors, proving that the foundations laid in India—education, adaptability, and openness—resonate globally.
The exchange in Norway underscores a bigger issue: how the West perceives India versus how India views itself today. India is moving past insecurities tied to colonialism and wants relationships based on mutual respect. Trust isn’t something that can be demanded; it develops through consistent interactions and a willingness for honest dialogue.
In this global context, the conversation around trust, democracy, and human rights is complex and requires deeper understanding on all sides.
For more on the topic of India’s democratic resilience, you can read the Pew Research Center’s findings.
