Over 1,500 Gaza Buildings Obliterated: Impact of Israel’s Actions Since Ceasefire

Israel’s military actions in Gaza have led to the destruction of more than 1,500 buildings since the ceasefire began on October 10. Satellite images, taken up until November 8, reveal significant devastation in areas under Israeli control. However, it’s believed that the actual number of destroyed structures may be even higher due to limited available imagery.

Many experts argue that these demolitions might breach the ceasefire agreement negotiated by the U.S., Egypt, Qatar, and Turkey. An Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) spokesperson insisted that operations were in line with the ceasefire terms.

US President Trump’s peace plan, which is foundational to the ceasefire, stipulates that military operations should cease. He has frequently claimed that “the war is over.”

Using a change detection algorithm, BBC Verify analyzed satellite images before and after the ceasefire, leading to significant findings of property destruction in Gaza. This included areas designated by the Yellow Line, a boundary within Gaza where Israel agreed to redeploy its forces.

Reports from Gaza show that many buildings destroyed had previously appeared undamaged. For instance, in eastern Khan Younis, images from early October 2023 reveal homes with gardens and trees that were intact before their demolition.

Lana Khalil, a former resident of one of the affected areas, described her home as a “heaven” filled with greenery, now reduced to rubble. She expressed heartache over the loss, stating, “The Israeli military left nothing to us; they demolished everything.”

The pattern of destruction extends to other regions, including Shejaiya in Gaza City and neighborhoods near Jabalia camp. While some Israeli officials argue that these actions do not violate the ceasefire—claiming they focus on areas behind the Yellow Line—others, like Dr. H A Hellyer, a senior associate at RUSI, firmly believe they do.

Legal experts, such as Professor Adil Haque from Rutgers University, contend that the laws of war prohibit destroying civilian properties during an occupation unless necessary for military operations. He argues that significant destruction during a ceasefire doesn’t qualify as militarily necessary.

As the situation evolves, experts worry these demolitions could have long-term consequences for peace efforts in the region. Disrupting the fragile balance established by the ceasefire may lead to further violence and instability.

In social media discussions, reactions to the ongoing demolitions reveal a mix of indignation and solidarity for the affected residents. Many users express concern over the humanitarian impact and the potential escalation of conflict if demolitions continue unchecked.

For further details, you can refer to the BBC’s satellite analysis.

Source link