The Pentagon is making big changes to how it handles climate studies and programs. Recently, they announced the cancellation of several projects focused on climate change, including research into how a warmer planet might increase instability in Africa. According to former officials, the military is reviewing contracts for the term “climate” as part of an effort to cut funding for such initiatives.
This shift comes from the top, driven by President Donald Trump, who has previously called climate change a hoax. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has also expressed strong opposition to climate science, stating a dedication to shifting focus back to primary military duties.
Hegseth tweeted, “The @DeptofDefense does not do climate change crap. We do training and warfighting.” It’s still unclear how many projects are on the chopping block or the financial impact of these cuts. The Pentagon claimed halting 91 studies could save about $30 million, but hasn’t detailed other potential savings. Instead, they focused on their mission of “deterring, fighting and winning wars,” discounting climate-related work as not aligning with that mission.
However, many defense experts are concerned about these cancellations. They argue that understanding climate impact is essential for military readiness and global stability. John Conger, a former senior defense official, explained that climate-related issues, such as rising sea levels and extreme weather, directly affect military operations.
A report from the Defense Department highlighted that climate change is already costing taxpayers billions and threatening military readiness. The military had been integrating clean energy into operations as a strategic advantage, rather than just for environmental reasons. For example, there are efforts to develop hybrid tanks, which actually help extend operational ranges and reduce heat signatures to avoid detection, contrary to claims that they only cater to environmentalists.
Richard Kidd, another former defense official, emphasized that modern warfare relies on technology like electricity for drones and advanced weapon systems. He warned that cutting climate programs puts the Pentagon at a disadvantage when competing against global powers like China, which is aware of its own climate challenges.
In fact, many military experts view the study of climate change as crucial, describing it as a "threat multiplier" that can exacerbate regional conflicts and impact troop safety. Sherri Goodman, a former deputy undersecretary of Defense, noted that ignoring climate risks could create significant blind spots for the military.
Recent surveys have shown that a significant portion of the public believes climate change poses a threat to national security. A report by the Center for Climate and Security found that 70% of Americans support the military taking action against climate change.
In summary, while the Pentagon aims to refocus its efforts, experts caution against sidelining climate considerations. The interactions between climate change, military effectiveness, and global politics will remain a significant issue for the future.
For more about the military’s stance on climate issues and impacts on national security, see the Department of Defense’s climate adaptation plan.
Check out this related article: Unlocking the Secrets of Weather: How Hidden Patterns Can Revolutionize Long-Range Drought Forecasting
Source link