Rallying Together: How Trump’s Executive Orders Demand a Unified Response from Higher Education in 2028

In a recent email, President Christina Paxson and Provost Francis Doyle expressed concern about the unpredictability in higher education. This sentiment resonates with many Americans after the Trump administration issued a surprising memo that paused nearly all federal grants and loans. Although that memo was quickly rescinded, the impact of Trump’s actions continues to create unease.

The swift reversal of the funding freeze highlights the ongoing chaos surrounding Trump’s plans as he embarks on his second term. He has openly stated his intention to challenge higher education institutions. Colleges and universities need to be ready to respond effectively to these threats. It’s essential for Brown and other universities to collaborate and create a robust defense for higher education.

At a National Conservatism Conference in 2021, Vice President JD Vance labeled universities as “hostile institutions.” He argued that the conservative movement must actively confront these institutions to achieve its goals. This rhetoric reflects a broader trend embraced by the Trump administration, where they aim to limit federal financial support to exert control over universities.

Additionally, Trump remains committed to dismantling diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts in education. Although the specifics of implementation are still unclear, the administration seems focused on undermining university autonomy through financial pressure.

In response, universities across the country are mobilizing. Many are establishing a foothold in Washington, D.C., or hiring lobbyists to guard against the introduction of detrimental taxes and funding cuts. However, top universities like Brown need to do more. They should gather a diverse team of lawyers, scholars, and administrators prepared to take collective action to protect education if these threats continue.

Recently, various nonprofit organizations and businesses launched a lawsuit against the federal funding halt, temporarily stopping its enforcement. The attorneys general from 22 states and Washington D.C. joined in this effort. The White House’s quick retreat indicates that united legal action can indeed make a difference.

There is strength in numbers. A collaborative team from multiple institutions can respond more swiftly and effectively than individual schools facing Trump’s policies alone. In their communication, Paxson and Doyle assured the Brown community that they are ready to defend the university’s mission when laws or regulations put this mission in jeopardy.

To truly uphold this commitment, Brown could follow the example of successful group advocacy that has previously curtailed harmful policies. Effectively standing against adverse regulations means taking swift legal action alongside other institutions, rather than just making promises. This collaborative approach would clearly demonstrate dedication to the values of higher education.

CJ Lair ’28 can be reached at craig_lair@brown.edu. Please send responses to this column to letters@browndailyherald.com and other opinions to opinions@browndailyherald.com.