This past week has been tough for many of us in Los Angeles. It’s hard not to think back to last year when we watched our neighborhoods in flames while feeling powerless. On top of that, we heard troubling news, like the withdrawal from a crucial international climate treaty and plans to ramp up oil production from Venezuela. It’s easy to feel overwhelmed.
But despite the bleak news, I find hope in my students. They inspire me with their fresh perspectives and determination to tackle climate issues. In my final Climate Law and Policy class last semester at UCLA Law, I asked them to share their thoughts on the future of climate policy. Their responses varied widely in emotion—some were hopeful, others frustrated, and many felt a mix of both. Yet, each found a path forward, and that gives me hope.
Here are some standout insights from their reflections:
Alex W. pointed out that keeping global temperature rise below 1.5 degrees Celsius seems increasingly unlikely without a collective effort. He emphasized the need for a cultural shift in how we approach climate change—one that acknowledges the challenges of litigation while pushing for publicity around climate issues.
Sophie B. echoed this sentiment, highlighting the need for accountability among fossil fuel companies. She argued that real change requires addressing the deep political ties such companies have. This is essential for creating a culture ready to take climate action seriously.
Shezain D. noted the political reluctance to tackle fossil fuels directly, which weakens climate goals. He referenced the Climate Overshoot Commission warning that we might exceed the crucial temperature limit if we don’t act fast. COP30, for instance, fell short of creating strong policies to phase out fossil fuels, making it harder to enforce necessary changes.
Ian B. suggested we should explore all solutions, even those that seem unconventional, like geoengineering. While some are wary of these technologies because they might allow continued fossil fuel use, he believes they could be necessary to limit climate damage.
Talia B. expressed concern about the political and economic conflicts overshadowing clear scientific warnings. She pointed out that current international agreements, like the Paris Agreement, lack enforceable measures, making real progress challenging.
María Paula H. argued that developing nations are stepping up to commit to climate action while many wealthier nations hesitate. Strong legal frameworks and international support for these countries are critical to drive meaningful change.
Julianne F. shared her optimism about local governments leading climate initiatives. She cited examples of innovative strategies in state and local policies that, although limited, can set the stage for larger solutions.
On a broader level, several students raised the topic of financing. Hayden F. stressed the importance of diverse funding sources, including litigation against polluters. Similarly, Camila F. noted that private investment must rise significantly, especially in developing countries that lack resources for climate adaptation. She emphasized that domestic regulations must evolve to turn businesses into partners in the fight against climate change.
In sum, while the current political landscape can feel disheartening, there is still room for optimism. Many students highlighted the importance of public engagement and clear communication about climate risks. They believe that fostering a collective will and prioritizing social justice can lead to significant progress in the coming years.
With the next decade critical for our planet’s future, it’s vital we stay focused and proactive. Every effort counts, and adapting to new challenges will be key to ensuring a livable world for future generations.
Source link
UCLA Law; climate change student voices; future of climate policy
