Drexel University has recently decided to enforce city codes that will limit where mobile street vendors, like food trucks, can park overnight. This move has sparked concerns among many students and community members.
In discussions with the Undergraduate Student Government Association, Drexel officials, including Vice President Mel Singleton, cited various reasons for this decision. They mentioned safety issues including complaints about food trucks, potential dangers from propane tanks, sanitation concerns, and pedestrian safety on 34th Street. However, some argue that the real concerns extend beyond food trucks.
Jaywalking and traffic violations have been common for years on 34th Street, long before food trucks began operating there. Simply removing the trucks may not improve the situation. Many pedestrians are aware of the risks when crossing streets and may not benefit from the trucks being cleared away. Also, pedestrian visibility isn’t just hindered by food trucks—other vehicles frequently park on the same shoulder.
Interestingly, the decision to enforce these parking restrictions now raises questions. Many food trucks, like Pete’s Little Lunch Box, have been in operation for many years. It seems a bit late to raise concerns about emergency clearing when similar situations have been handled before without issue. For instance, during protests last summer, Drexel and local police successfully managed to clear streets despite the presence of food trucks. This raises the question: why is this issue suddenly a priority now?
Drexel has also mentioned specific vendor complaints, such as one vendor who misused a public restroom. But rather than attaching blame to all food trucks for the actions of a few, targeted solutions would likely be more effective.
The university’s claims that enforcing overnight parking restrictions will improve sanitation or safety appear unconvincing to some. Health regulations already require food trucks to adhere to safety standards, and forcing them to relocate might actually lead to less cleanliness, not more.
Concerns about propane safety have also been cited, but reports indicate that food trucks are already following strict guidelines about storage that minimize risks. Additionally, the proximity of food trucks to one another is another area of concern, yet some trucks operating between the main buildings remain untouched.
Instead of blaming the City Council for these restrictions, Drexel could choose to exercise discretion in enforcing laws. For example, they haven’t consistently enforced laws requiring food trucks to have trash cans available.
City Councilwoman Jamie Gauthier supports food truck vendors and has encouraged Drexel to collaborate with them, which suggests there may be room for compromise that benefits everyone.
Chief Singleton has clarified that while code violation notices are being issued, food trucks aren’t technically being forced to leave. However, fines could deter some vendors from continuing their business on campus, ultimately reducing student dining options.
The chicken-or-egg scenario of parking competition means many trucks might struggle to find spots, affecting their viability. This could lead to an increase in prices as competition diminishes, which is less than ideal for students seeking affordable food options.
Drexel claims to be looking into solutions for the food trucks, including potentially converting a nearby lot into vendor parking. However, the question remains: why not focus on solutions that support food vendors instead of enforcing fines first?
Food trucks have been a staple of campus life for years, and their presence enriches the Drexel community. Rather than pushing them out, the university must recognize their value and work toward a solution that keeps them on campus. After all, students deserve access to the diverse and delicious options these vendors provide.
Source link
Drexel,Food Truck,Philadelphia,Philadelphia City Council,politics,save the food trucks,The Triangle