Royal mosque or mythological temple in Sambhal? What is the footnote of an Englishman and the truth of Babar?

About three months in the past a temple-mosque dispute began in the nation. This dispute was relating to the Shahi Jama Masjid of Sambhal district of Uttar Pradesh. On November 19, 2024, a petition was filed in the district courtroom and it was claimed that this is not a mosque, however Sri Harihar Temple. The petition was heard and on the similar day the mosque was surveyed on the orders of the courtroom. This survey was carried out peacefully, however on November 24, when the staff reached once more for the survey, violence broke out and 5 individuals misplaced their lives. After that the survey was not carried out, however the administration began anti-encroachment marketing campaign in Sambhal, in which outdated temples, stepwells and wells have been detected. Now on Wednesday (January 8, 2025), Allahabad High Court has stayed the listening to of Sambhal Masjid case in the district courtroom.

This is not the first time that the concern of mosque and temple has been raised in Sambhal. A petition was additionally filed in the yr 1878. However, at the moment solely permission was sought to enter the mosque, no demand was made to supply prayers. According to BBC report, lawyer Mashhood Ali Farooqui, on behalf of the Mosque Committee, has stated that this petition was filed by an individual named Chheda Singh. At that point the listening to was held in Moradabad courtroom, however Chheda Singh had misplaced the case. At that point two vital questions have been raised in this matter. Firstly, was there ever a temple there earlier than or was there already a mosque right here? After this Chheda Singh additionally went to Allahabad High Court however he was defeated there too. Allahabad High Court, on the foundation of documentary proof, accepted that there was a mosque right here, neither worship was ever held there nor any temple was ever demolished to construct a mosque.

Now that the petition has been filed, the similar questions are being raised once more and arguments are being given from each the sides. Mahant Rishiraj Giri, a petitioner from the Hindu facet, claims that Sambhal is an historical metropolis and Kalki, the tenth incarnation of Lord Vishnu, was born right here. A Mahant of Kaila Devi temple, whereas exhibiting a triangular map of Sambhal, stated that this is not a mosque however a temple and he is making ready for worship in the premises. He says that this is described in Skanda Mahapuran. It additionally mentions that there are a lot of pilgrimage websites in Sambhal. 

Another petitioner in the case, Harishankar Jain, has talked about Baburnama in his petition. The Baburnama was written by the Mughal ruler Babur himself and translated by the British Orientalist Annette Beverage. This is an vital supply of Babar’s period. At the age of 12, Babar began writing Baburnama and wrote it until 1530. It was printed in 1531. There is point out of three mosques in it, together with Jama Masjid of Sambhal. However, American historian Howard Crane wrote a analysis paper Patronage of Zahir al-Din Babur, which was printed in 1987.

Howard Crane stated that the mosque of Sambhal is not talked about in Baburnama. He writes that Hindu Beg got here from Kabul with Babar and was appointed the administrator of Sambhal. At the similar time, Annette Beverage, who translated Baburnama, added a footnote or translator’s remark in the English translation, stating that Hindu Beg had constructed the mosque in Sambhal on the orders of Babur. He had additionally expressed the risk of having a temple at this place.

Also learn:-
On the Sambhal investigation, Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi said on Virendra Singh’s statement – ‘Anything in the name of Lord Krishna…’

Source link