Russian Politicians Criticize Trump’s Venezuela Strike as Unlawful and Destabilizing: Key Insights and Implications

Admin

Russian Politicians Criticize Trump’s Venezuela Strike as Unlawful and Destabilizing: Key Insights and Implications

MOSCOW, Jan 4 (Reuters) — Recently, Russian officials criticized U.S. actions in Venezuela. They believe that President Trump is acting unlawfully and putting U.S. interests above global stability.

Trump claimed that Venezuela’s leader, Maduro, had been captured and taken out of the country. This bold statement raised eyebrows and triggered calls for urgent talks at the United Nations.

Dmitry Medvedev, a senior Russian official, emphasized that while Trump’s actions may not be legal, they show a clear commitment to what he sees as American national interests. “Latin America is viewed as the United States’ playground,” he said, suggesting Trump aims to leverage Venezuela’s vast oil resources. Medvedev stated simply, “Uncle Sam’s main motivation has always been other people’s supplies.”

Another Russian senator, Alexei Pushkov, commented on the potential fallout from these actions. He warned that Trump’s bold rhetoric might be more dramatic than effective. He compared it to past U.S. conflicts in Iraq and Libya, where initial victories turned into prolonged problems. “What will the final result be? Will this triumph lead to a catastrophe?” Pushkov questioned.

Both officials noted that such military moves could be seen as a move towards old imperialist tactics, reviving a sense of colonial swagger in modern politics. Interestingly, Russia has a long-standing friendship with Venezuela, marked by energy agreements and military partnerships.

Recent data shows that U.S. sanctions and interventions have led to significant challenges for Venezuela. According to the World Bank, the country’s economy has shrunk by around 75% since 2014, causing a humanitarian crisis that has driven millions to flee. This context adds weight to the concerns raised by Russian officials.

Public reaction to U.S. actions in Venezuela is mixed. On social media, many users are calling for diplomatic resolutions rather than military ones, citing the disastrous outcomes of previous U.S. interventions.

In summary, as tensions rise in Venezuela, it is crucial to consider the historical implications and the potential consequences of such aggressive foreign policies, both for the region and the world. For more details on U.S.-Venezuela relations, you can check reputable sources like the Council on Foreign Relations for in-depth analysis.



Source link

TOPIC:MARKETS-COMMODITIES-ENERGY,RULES:RUSSIA,COM,CRU,CWP,DIP,ENER,ENFF,ENG,ENR,EU,GEN,INTAG,NEWS1,NRG,OILG,POL,POTUS,SECUR,VIO,WAR,WASH,CEEU,WEU,AMERS,US,EUROP,RU,VE,NASIA,NAMER,EMEA,ASXPAC,CISC,EMRG,LATAM,ASIA,SAMER,EEU,DEST:CSA,DEST:LBY,DEST:REULB,DEST:G,DEST:RAST,DEST:SOF,DEST:M,DEST:PGE,DEST:RNP,DEST:E,DEST:C,DEST:AFA,DEST:GRO,DEST:PSC,DEST:U,DEST:O,DEST:MTL,DEST:UCDPTEST,DEST:RWSA,DEST:GNS,DEST:RWS,DEST:D,DEST:RBN,DEST:OIL,DEST:OCATPM,DEST:OUSTPM,DEST:OUSWDM,DEST:OUKTPM,PACKAGE:US-TOP-NEWS,PACKAGE:WORLD-NEWS