Sabrina Carpenter Calls Out White House for Using Her Song in Controversial Social Media Video: Here’s Why She’s Fuming!

Pop star Sabrina Carpenter recently expressed her outrage towards the White House for using her song “Juno” in a controversial video. The White House’s official X account posted a montage showing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers, with the song’s lyrics playing in the background. Carpenter quickly reacted, calling the video “evil and disgusting,” and insisted that her music should not be linked to what she described as an inhumane agenda.

This isn’t the first time music artists have criticized government use of their songs. In a similar incident, Franklin the Turtle’s publisher condemned a violent mock-up featuring the character in a political context. They emphasized that Franklin stands for kindness and should not be used for violent portrayals.

In recent months, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) also faced backlash. They used the theme song from “Pokémon” in a video without permission from Nintendo, which pointed out that they were not involved in the content’s creation. The use of popular songs in these contexts raises significant questions about the ethics of intellectual property.

In September, comedian Theo Von reacted to DHS using a snippet of him for immigration-related content. He insisted that he didn’t approve the use and requested its removal, expressing that he has more nuanced views on immigration than the video suggested.

Interestingly, this behavior from government agencies has historical roots. Over the years, various administrations have been called out for similarly using popular culture in ways that sparked public ire. From musical artists to beloved children’s characters, the intersection of politics and art continues to provoke discussion about respect and intention behind the use of cultural expressions.

According to a recent survey by the American Civil Liberties Union, over 70% of artists feel uncomfortable with their music being used without permission in political contexts. This statistic underscores a growing concern about the ownership and intention behind artistic work in modern society.

As social media continues to grow as a platform for political messaging, it’s essential to consider how artists and creators want their work to be associated. The conversation around intellectual property rights, especially in political contexts, will likely continue to be a hot topic in the social media age.

For more on artists’ rights and how they are affected by political use of their work, you can explore the ACLU’s report.

Source link