Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs Challenges Conviction: Seeks Acquittal or New Trial, Calling Verdict ‘Unconstitutional’ | CNN

Sean “Diddy” Combs is seeking to have his conviction overturned or to receive a new trial before he’s sentenced. In a 62-page document, his defense argues that he was unfairly targeted by the government and claims his conviction is unconstitutional.

Recently convicted of two counts of transportation for prostitution, Combs was acquitted of more serious charges, including racketeering and sex trafficking. Prosecutors accused him of leading a criminal group that exploited women, but Combs’ lawyers contended these encounters were consensual and part of a “swingers’” lifestyle. His defense team maintains that the evidence presented in the trial was weak.

They argue that Combs is the only person in the U.S. convicted under the Mann Act for these circumstances. They believe that had he only been charged with the two prostitution counts, the trial would have focused more on his actual actions instead of alleged violence.

In the memorandum, attorney Alexandra Shapiro said, “This conviction stands alone, but it should not stand at all.” She pointed out that since his arrest, the government has portrayed him negatively. Combs’ trial lasted just two months, and the jury ultimately rejected the more severe accusations.

The defense emphasizes that the Mann Act does not require proof of coercion. They pointed out that all parties involved were adults who chose to participate. “Mr. Combs is the only person ever convicted of violating the statute for conduct anything like this,” they stated.

Witnesses, including former partners, testified that they felt coerced into having sex with other men, citing Combs’ controlling behavior. During the trial, footage showed evidence of his violent tendencies. Yet, despite this, the jury did not find him guilty of sex trafficking.

The filing asserts, “The verdict confirms the women were not vulnerable or exploited.” It also states that evidence presented shows no profit motive on Combs’s part regarding prostitution. The defense posited that the recordings in question should be seen as personal, not criminal.

Combs’ team is arguing that his experience falls under protected personal expression, not illegal activity. The defense aims to convince the judge that the charges don’t align with established practices in similar cases, where consensual adult interactions don’t lead to convictions.

As he awaits sentencing, set for October 3, Combs has also filed for release on a $50 million bond, insisting he poses no flight risk or danger to society. However, previous bail requests have been denied due to concerns over his history of violent behavior. His case continues to spark discussions about consent, exploitation, and the legal interpretation of the Mann Act, especially as it pertains to high-profile individuals.

For more information about related legal precedents, you can read this report from the U.S. Department of Justice.

Source link