Unauthorized drone flights over U.S. military bases and large events are on the rise, causing concern among lawmakers and security experts. Senator Tom Cotton highlighted this growing threat in a recent CBS News interview, stating that unauthorized drone incursions have increased in severity. Data from the Defense Department shows over 350 such flights were reported across about 100 military sites, with an alarming 27,000 drone detections near the southern border in just the last six months of 2024.
Drone incursions at stadiums have also surged. NFL statistics indicate these incidents almost doubled from 1,300 to 2,300 between 2021 and 2024. While many operators may be hobbyists or unaware of the risks, the increasing accessibility of drone technology means that criminal groups could exploit them for nefarious purposes.
Cotton mentioned that some drone flights might be testing U.S. responses, which he feels are inadequate due to legal restrictions. He withheld details about possible foreign government involvement but suggested the risks are escalating.
Security experts have previously warned that these drone incursions can be more than just observations; they could pave the way for future attacks. For example, Ukraine’s Operation Spider’s Web demonstrated how drones can strike significant military targets, causing extensive damage while using minimal resources. This operation is often cited in U.S. security discussions as a warning about the potential dangers posed by unregulated drone activity.
Many U.S. military bases lack the legal framework to respond to these drone threats effectively. General Gregory M. Guillot testified earlier this year that only half of these installations are legally protected from drones. While federal agencies can mitigate drone threats, local authorities often find themselves powerless, even in emergencies involving civilian spaces, like airports or stadiums.
Cotton, along with a bipartisan group, is advocating for new legislation aimed at closing these gaps. Their proposed DEFENSE Act would empower trained local law enforcement to deal with hostile drone activities at public events, while the COUNTER Act would redefine protected sites, extending coverage to more military bases.
As drone flights increase, so do public safety concerns. With major events like the Olympics and the World Cup happening in the U.S. next year, the urgency for stronger regulations is clear. Failure to act could leave the U.S. responding reactively rather than proactively.
In light of this, consistent monitoring and updated legislation are essential to safeguard not just military installations but also public areas prone to drone overflights. The evolving landscape of drone use necessitates a robust response to ensure the safety of all Americans.
For more information on related legislative efforts, check out this relevant report from the Department of Homeland Security.
