Serbian Officials Refute Claims of Sonic Weapon Attack on Peaceful Protesters: What Really Happened?

Admin

Serbian Officials Refute Claims of Sonic Weapon Attack on Peaceful Protesters: What Really Happened?

BELGRADE, Serbia (AP) — Serbian officials are denying allegations that they used a military-grade sonic weapon to disperse protesters during a massive anti-government rally in Belgrade. The rally, which attracted over 100,000 participants, is part of a growing movement against President Aleksandar Vucic’s administration. This movement gained momentum after a tragic train station accident in November killed 15 people, which many believe was due to government negligence and corruption.

Opposition leaders and human rights groups claimed that the controversial acoustic device was deployed at the rally on Saturday, causing panic among the crowd. They plan to take legal action against those responsible, both domestically and at the European Court of Human Rights.

Footage from the event shows people reacting to the sudden sound that erupted during a moment of silence for the train disaster. Eyewitnesses reported a chaotic scene as attendees scrambled for safety, leaving streets almost deserted.

Experts say sonic weapons can cause severe ear pain, disorientation, and panic in those exposed. Prolonged contact can lead to lasting damage, such as ruptured eardrums. This has prompted criticism from several organizations, including the Belgrade Centre for Security Policy, which condemned the use of such "prohibited weapons" against peaceful protesters.

Serbian police and defense officials firmly deny any such weapon was employed. President Vucic has called on judicial bodies to investigate the claims, insisting that if the allegations are false, those spreading them should be held accountable. Meanwhile, Belgrade’s emergency hospital has reported no incidents of injuries related to the alleged weapon use.

The protests are not just a reaction to one event. They signify a broader dissatisfaction with Vucic’s administration, which has faced accusations of corruption and mismanagement for years. A recent survey indicated that nearly 70% of Serbians express distrust in the government, a sentiment that has fueled ongoing demonstrations.

These protests reflect a similar pattern seen in other global movements, where citizens mobilize against perceived injustices, seeking accountability from their leaders. They are demanding not just attention to past tragedies but also long-term reforms to ensure safety and transparency in governance.

As the situation unfolds, it poses a vital question for Serbia’s future: Will the government’s response to these protests lead to genuine change, or will it further entrench divisions within society?

For more insights on the impact of political protests in Serbia, you can check the Belgrade Centre for Security Policy which offers valuable analysis on the topic.

Source link

Aleksandar Vucic, Serbia, Protests and demonstrations, Belgrade, Rail accidents, General news, Europe, Washington news, Politics, Military and defense