Spotlight on Jesuit Missions: Key Insights from Days 4 and 5 at the UN Climate Change Conference | ICN

On June 20th, key members of the Network of Catholic Climate and Environment Actors (NCCEA) met with a delegation from the Holy See, or Vatican. Their discussions centered on some pressing climate issues.

First, they talked about Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). These are the plans countries make to cut carbon emissions. While some countries, like Vanuatu, have set ambitious targets, many others fall short. The NCCEA urged the Vatican to submit its own plan to show leadership.

Next on the agenda was a Just Transition to a low-carbon economy. This transition must respect everyone’s rights and ensure no one is left behind. The conversation also highlighted the crucial need for climate finance. Developed countries should provide substantial funds—grants—not loans—to help developing nations. Cancelling unjust debts was also stressed as part of this support.

Another important point was the Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage. This fund needs more financial support to truly make an impact on communities affected by climate change. The NCCEA also emphasized the need for Climate Empowerment. Countries need resources for climate education to inspire action at all levels.

The dialogue also touched on revamping food systems. The NCCEA argued for a global food sovereignty framework. This means adapting production methods to local needs while respecting ecological practices.

Looking ahead to COP30 in November in Brazil, the group expressed the need for coordinated efforts among Catholic organizations and the Church. The Holy See delegation acknowledged the necessity of climate education globally. They echoed Pope Francis’ call for debt relief, emphasizing that a proper Just Transition must consider the interconnectedness of all life.

As the week progressed, it became clear that richer nations often hesitated to contribute meaningfully to climate initiatives. Delegates debated over small wording changes in official texts instead of focusing on substantial solutions. This lack of urgency was palpable, especially as developing countries insisted that wealthy nations fulfill their financial commitments as outlined in the Paris Agreement.

Additionally, communication barriers hindered effective participation. Limited translation options due to UN budget cuts made it hard for many delegates to engage fully. Meanwhile, side events showcased hopeful initiatives, like agroecological practices that support small farmers and build resilience against climate impacts.

In conclusion, the push for a united global response on climate change continues. While challenges remain, there’s a sense of determination among advocates to keep the momentum going. The struggle for justice, especially for the most vulnerable, is ongoing.

Source link