Starbucks has found itself in hot water after losing a lawsuit tied to a serious incident involving a customer’s painful burns. A jury awarded Michael Garcia, a delivery driver, $50 million for injuries he sustained when a scalding drink spilled into his lap at a Starbucks drive-thru in California.
On February 8, 2020, Garcia picked up an order of three large "medicine ball" drinks. Unfortunately, one was poorly secured by a barista. As Garcia drove away, the lid popped off, causing the hot drink to splash into his lap and resulting in severe injuries, including third-degree burns.
The jury’s decision came after they reviewed video footage showing the drink precariously placed in a tray. Garcia’s attorney, Nick Rowley, argued that this carelessness led to the incident, which left Garcia with lasting injuries. He underwent two skin grafts on his genitals, suffering life-altering consequences, including chronic pain.
Rowley highlighted the emotional toll on Garcia. “One of the most pleasurable experiences in life has been changed to pain,” he said, emphasizing that these injuries will affect every aspect of his life.
While the jury deliberated for only 40 minutes, their decision was significant. They not only recognized the severity of Garcia’s injuries but also aimed to hold Starbucks accountable for safety lapses. Rowley had initially sought $120 million in damages, a figure Starbucks rejected, suggesting the amount requested was excessive.
In response, Starbucks expressed sympathy but disagreed with the verdict. The company plans to appeal the decision and maintains that it upholds high safety standards when serving hot beverages. A spokesperson for Starbucks emphasized that they had previously offered Garcia $3 million to settle the case—which he accepted on the condition that the company would apologize and improve their safety protocols, a request that Starbucks declined.
This incident brings to mind another high-profile case from the ’90s involving McDonald’s, where a woman was awarded nearly $3 million after suffering burns from hot coffee. These cases raise questions about corporate responsibility and customer safety, especially in the food industry.
Such legal battles are increasingly common, with consumers being more vocal about holding companies accountable. According to a recent survey by the American Bar Association, 64% of Americans believe companies should take responsibility for the safety of their products. This shift in public perception has pushed corporations to rethink their policies and practices regarding customer interactions and safety measures.
Starbucks’s situation reminds us that businesses must prioritize safety and customer well-being. As consumers continue to advocate for better practices, companies will need to adapt or face similar consequences in the future.
For more details about customer safety standards, you can read about best practices from reputable sources like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Check out this related article: Is Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Preparing to Sell Its Real Estate Brokerage? Discover the Implications for Investors!
Source link