Starlink’s Daily Satellite Burn: What You Need to Know About Their 1-2 Satellites Lost Each Day

Have you ever wondered how many Starlink satellites re-enter Earth’s atmosphere each day? It’s about one or two. As SpaceX ramps up its operations, that number will likely increase.

Harvard astrophysicist Jonathan McDowell, a prominent space tracker, says the impact of these satellites on our planet isn’t fully understood. However, Starlink poses less of a risk compared to other satellite ventures. McDowell stated that once many low Earth orbit constellations, including Starlink, reach a total of around 30,000 satellites, roughly five could re-enter the atmosphere daily. This is based on an average replacement cycle of five years.

An alarming concern is the potential for Kessler syndrome, a scenario where space debris collides and creates more debris, making certain parts of orbit unusable. McDowell commented, “Starlink isn’t the largest worry, but the situation could escalate.” To help prevent this chain reaction, active satellite maneuvers are essential, though their success isn’t guaranteed.

The strategy for retired Starlink satellites involves using their thrusters to lower them to a point where they will eventually burn up upon reentry. McDowell emphasized that if satellites are deorbited properly and collisions are avoided, the Kessler syndrome might be kept at bay.

But accidents can happen. Events like solar storms could disable numerous satellites, potentially creating more debris. McDowell pointed out, “If just 1% of Starlink satellites fail, that’s still 300 satellites. That could tip low Earth orbit into chaos.”

China’s ambitious satellite plans heighten the concern. Many of their satellites will operate in low Earth orbit, but others will fly at higher altitudes—where atmospheric drag is minimal. If something were to go wrong at these higher altitudes, the aftermath could be dire. McDowell noted, “We haven’t seen plans for how they’ll manage those satellites once they’re done; they could stick around for centuries.”

As satellites burn up upon reentering, we face another potential issue: pollution. McDowell is worried that we may be using the upper atmosphere as a dumping ground without fully understanding the impact. According to the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), around 10% of aerosol particles in the stratosphere contain aluminum and other metals from rockets and satellites. That figure could rise to 50% as launches increase. The long-term effects of this pollution remain largely unknown.

While experts continue to explore the consequences of satellite reentry, McDowell cautioned that we might already be experiencing harmful changes. “The range of opinions goes from ‘it’s too small to matter’ to ‘we’re in trouble already.’ The uncertainty is what’s frightening.”

Ongoing research aims to uncover the effects of satellite incineration in our atmosphere. If SpaceX and others expand their constellations, we could face more than just orbital collisions—we could also contend with environmental repercussions.

Source link