Supreme Court Denies Anticipatory Bail to Dunki Agent, Impacting Indian Passport Standing

New Delhi: On Monday, the Supreme Court denied anticipatory bail to a man accused of deceiving another individual by promising to send him to the U.S. via the “dunki route.” This illegal migration method involves using human smugglers to traverse dangerous paths that often lead through multiple countries.

A bench of Justices Ujjal Bhuyyan and Manmohan labeled the offence as “very serious,” pointing out that such incidents tarnish the reputation of Indian passports on the global stage. “They also adversely affect genuine travelers,” the bench noted when dismissing the plea.

The case involves Om Parkash from Haryana, who faces several serious charges including cheating and criminal conspiracy. The court learned that he not only deceived the complainant but also subjected him to harsh conditions while facilitating his illegal entry into the U.S.

Parkash is challenging a prior decision by the Punjab and Haryana High Court that refused to grant him relief. Allegations suggest he acted as an accomplice to the main agent, who promised the complainant travel to the U.S. for ₹43 lakh. The main accused arranged for the complainant to fly to Dubai in September 2024, then took him to various countries before leading him through Panama’s forests and ultimately to Mexico. On February 1, 2025, the authorities made him cross the U.S. border, where he was later arrested and deported back to India.

The appeal to the Supreme Court highlights a growing problem. According to recent statistics, over 80% of illegal migrants in the U.S. are from developing countries, with many using perilous routes like the “dunki route.” Migration experts warn that such measures are not only risky but often lead to human rights violations. The International Organization for Migration has reported increasing fatalities and abuses linked to human smuggling in recent years.

Social media has been vocal about the dangers of these migration routes, with many users sharing stories of peril and loss. Conversations on platforms like Twitter often reflect a mix of concern and outrage over these situations, emphasizing the need for safer, legal migration pathways.

Ultimately, cases like Om Parkash’s shed light on a broader issue of illegal migration practices. It’s a complex problem that requires both national and international attention, particularly as the consequences impact not just individuals but entire communities.

Source link

SUPREME COURT, INDIAN PASSPORTS, ANTICIPATORY BAIL, MIGRATION, DUNKI AGENT, SUPREME COURT REFUSES ANTICIPATORY BAIL TO ALLEGED DUNKI AGENT