Washington — The Trump administration is asking the Supreme Court to rule on the president’s executive order to end automatic birthright citizenship.
This move could decide whether the proposal can move forward. Traditionally, anyone born in the U.S. is considered a citizen, except for children of diplomats, as stated in the 14th Amendment. The Trump administration argues this rule doesn’t apply to temporary visitors or people who entered the country illegally.
Solicitor General D. John Sauer claims the accepted view of citizenship under the 14th Amendment is outdated and has “destructive consequences.” This court case is different from previous ones, which focused on whether federal judges could block the policy while the case was active. The current appeals are regular requests, likely taking months to resolve as they go through the court’s process.
In recent discussions, some experts have pointed out that the idea of birthright citizenship is deeply rooted in U.S. law. A study from the Pew Research Center in 2021 found that nearly 60% of Americans believe birthright citizenship should remain intact, reflecting strong public support for the traditional interpretation.
As legal experts weigh in, Cody Wofsy, deputy director of the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project, stated that the executive order is illegal and no legal maneuvering from the administration will change that.
Social media has erupted with opinions on this topic. Many users express concern over the potential dismantling of established citizenship rights, while others support a stricter interpretation of immigration laws.
It remains to be seen how the Supreme Court will respond to these appeals when they convene for a new term in October. As this legal battle unfolds, it could reshape the understanding of citizenship in America for generations to come.
For more details, you can read about the historical context of the 14th Amendment on the National Constitution Center.