It’s crucial for Americans to come together to support food aid programs, both at home and abroad. Hunger doesn’t just affect individuals; it has wide-reaching implications for our communities and our national interests. Recently, proposals from the Trump administration and Congress have threatened to cut essential programs that help combat hunger. This is a cause for concern that we all need to pay attention to.
Take the food stamp program, SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program), for instance. The Republican-led House of Representatives aims to reduce funding for this vital program, which millions of Americans rely on to afford groceries. With food prices soaring, SNAP provides much-needed assistance to struggling families, enabling them to purchase healthy food options.
Crystal FitzSimons, interim president of the Food Research and Action Center (FRAC), emphasizes the negative consequences these cuts could have. “The proposed SNAP cuts would strip away food assistance from millions of families, increase hunger and negative health outcomes, and weaken local economies,” she warns. These reductions would add pressure to food banks that are already overwhelmed.
To shine a light on the difficulties of living on SNAP benefits, FRAC is hosting a SNAP Challenge. This initiative encourages citizens and lawmakers to experience firsthand the challenges faced by those who depend on SNAP. Meredith Jorss from Share Our Strength echoes these concerns, stating, “Cutting grocery benefits won’t reduce hunger but will mean more families will struggle to afford food."
Efforts to address hunger shouldn’t stop at our borders. The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has been critical in fighting global hunger and poverty. Unfortunately, the Trump administration has proposed cuts to this agency, risking vital programs like Food for Peace—a lifeline for many suffering from famine and malnutrition worldwide. Established by President Dwight Eisenhower, Food for Peace has historically provided food assistance to those in dire need.
Recent statistics reveal the dire state of hunger globally. According to the United Nations, around 828 million people went hungry in 2021, underscoring the urgent need for effective humanitarian aid. In areas like Sudan and Gaza, the situation is especially dire, with children suffering from severe malnutrition that can have lasting impacts. USAID plays a vital role in supporting these programs, and any cuts would exacerbate these hardships.
American farms also benefit from the Food for Peace program, as they supply food to international efforts. Reducing overseas food aid won’t save taxpayers much money; in reality, it would harm both U.S. farmers and those in need.
As President Eisenhower said, helping those in need prevents chaos and instability—not just abroad, but at home. USAID’s work is also crucial for war victims, like those affected in Ukraine. With the current global humanitarian crisis, it’s imperative we maintain our support.
In a time when so many face hunger, it’s essential for everyone to voice the importance of maintaining and enhancing food aid initiatives. We need to remind our elected officials that addressing hunger is not just a local issue; it is a global responsibility.
For more information on how to advocate for food aid programs, visit Food Research and Action Center.
William Lambers is an author who collaborated with the UN World Food Program on the book "Ending World Hunger." The views shared here do not necessarily reflect those of Vermont News & Media.
Check out this related article: Multiple Food Recalls Triggered by Contamination: What You Need to Know About Food Safety Risks
Source linkopinion, columnists
