A recent study by ESRI reveals that both farmers and urban residents are committed to combating climate change. The findings show that there’s no significant divide between rural and urban attitudes toward climate action. People from both groups are ready to adopt changes, such as flying less, reducing meat consumption, and improving home energy efficiency.
Interestingly, many farmers actively consider climate concerns in their farming choices. About two-thirds of those surveyed indicated they’re likely to change their farming practices in the future to benefit the environment. This is contrary to the common belief that farmers are less worried about climate change than urban dwellers.
The study surveyed 467 farmers and included representative samples from both urban and rural populations. It aimed to assess how well people understand climate change, their willingness to change, and their support for policies aimed at addressing environmental issues. While awareness of climate change is high, factual knowledge about its causes and effects is lacking. For example, over a third of participants, irrespective of their background, did not recognize agriculture as a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions in Ireland.
A crucial finding is that many farmers are unaware of climate-smart practices available through government resources. Moreover, the connection between dietary choices and climate change is poorly understood. When surveyed, most people misjudged the impact of switching to a hybrid car compared to adopting a plant-based diet on emissions reduction. Notably, beef and dairy farmers struggled the most with this question.
Support for climate action policies varies between groups. Farmers prefer subsidies for adopting green technologies over restrictions like flight taxes or reducing herd sizes. The study finds that understanding emission sources can increase willingness to take action. Dr. Lucie Martin, the lead author, emphasizes that many share pro-climate views but often misperceive others’ worries and readiness to act.
In her view, emphasizing a shift in narrative could help unite communities rather than divide them. ESRI’s expert, Professor Pete Lunn, points out that improving knowledge about the diet-emission link is vital. A clear government message highlighting the benefits of healthy eating for both personal health and the environment could drive change.
The researchers acknowledge the complexities of reducing carbon emissions. While climate action has many benefits, including cleaner air and improved public health, it can disrupt current practices. By utilizing insights from behavioral science, policymakers can encourage voluntary changes rather than enforced mandates, especially in the agricultural sector.
For more insights on government policies and climate action approaches, check out this ESRI report.
Check out this related article: Join Us for an Inspiring Evening: Climate Author Delivers Engaging Talk and Reading at Pratt
Source linkesri,climate-change,food-production
