A new bill aimed at changing education regulations has recently passed out of the House Education Committee. This measure is seen by some lawmakers as a way to give more control to local school districts.
Despite amendments made to address previous concerns, Democratic lawmakers still voice strong objections. They are particularly worried about provisions that might dilute the requirements for the state’s secretary of education and allow public schools to convert into charter schools.
One significant change in HB 1002 would eliminate the requirement that a charter school operator must also manage a traditional public school. This could pave the way for public school districts to completely switch to charter models.
Democrats fear this shift could leave students without access to traditional public schools, especially given another proposed bill that would mandate struggling public schools with low enrollment to transition to charter schools. Although that bill is still awaiting a hearing, the implications are concerning for many.
Rep. Ed DeLaney (D-Indianapolis) expressed deep concern over these changes. He argued that they undermine the foundation of the state’s education system by suggesting that only charter schools matter and that a uniform education system isn’t necessary.
Others, like Rep. Sheila Klinker (D-Lafayette), shared stories illustrating the potential gaps in education services. She recounted how a local public school had to take in students mid-year who had been dropped from a charter school because it couldn’t meet their needs.
On the other hand, Rep. Bob Behning (R-Behning), the bill’s author, defended charter schools, emphasizing that they must accept all students. He highlighted that parents are likely more concerned about the quality of education rather than whether a school is a charter or a traditional public one.
The committee debated an amendment to restore the original language of the bill but did not pass it. Another key provision in the bill involves the qualifications needed for the state’s secretary of education, suggesting that current standards for residency, licensure, and education could be relaxed.
Democratic lawmakers believe that experience in education is crucial for this role. Rep. Vernon Smith (D-Gary) proposed an amendment to maintain educational qualifications, arguing that not just anyone can successfully lead an educational institution.
Attempts to reach a compromise that would require candidates to have administrative experience in education were also rejected by the Republican majority.
Now, the bill moves forward to be considered by the full Senate.
If you have any questions or concerns about education in Indiana, feel free to reach out to our education reporter at kadair@wfyi.org.
Check out this related article: Revolutionizing Education: Administration Officials Launch New Plan Targeting 5 Key School Districts Across the State – VTDigger
Source link