The Department of Justice is taking legal action against California over two new laws. These laws make it illegal for federal agents to wear masks while on duty and require them to show their identification. The DOJ argues that these laws conflict with the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause, which prioritizes federal laws over state laws.
The lawsuit, filed on a recent Monday, highlights concerns about the safety of federal officers. Bill Essayli, the federal prosecutor in Los Angeles, expressed his worries on social media, stating that the mask ban endangers agents and allows criminals to target them. In his words, the law “unconstitutionally exposes” officers to danger.
California Governor Gavin Newsom’s office quickly countered the DOJ’s claims. A spokesperson pointed out that the Trump administration should focus more on public safety rather than what they consider unnecessary actions against rights.
Newsom signed the No Secret Police Act in September. This act prohibits all officials from hiding their identities with face masks during operations, except for undercover officers, SWAT teams, and those with medical issues. Critics, including the California Association of Highway Patrolmen, have argued this law could put officers at risk, as it removes their ability to protect their identities.
Another law signed around the same time, the No Vigilantes Act, will require federal agents to visibly show their identification when operating in California, starting in January. This move came after concerns arose over federal agents conducting immigration enforcement while masked.
Research shows that laws affecting law enforcement can spark significant public debate. Surveys often reveal mixed opinions, with some advocating for increased transparency while others prioritize the safety and security of officers.
Interestingly, a similar version of the No Secret Police Act was introduced at the federal level by Representatives Dan Goldman and Adriano Espaillat from New York in June. This act also seeks to ban masks for law enforcement agents, aiming for increased accountability.
Overall, these legislative efforts in California mark a significant shift in the relationship between state and federal law enforcement. It underlines the ongoing tension over how law enforcement operates and the public’s right to know who is serving in these roles.
Source link
United States Department of Justice, California, Trump Administration
