President Trump’s budget office recently directed federal agencies to gather data about federal funds sent to 14 mostly Democratic states and the District of Columbia. This effort is described as a measure to curb improper or fraudulent use of these funds.
This directive follows Trump’s earlier announcement of plans to cut off federal funding to “sanctuary cities” that do not fully comply with his immigration policies. He has stated that this funding freeze would begin on February 1, although specifics are still unclear.
The memo didn’t specify why these particular states were chosen. Most were identified last year as “sanctuary” jurisdictions, except for Virginia. Recently, Virginia’s new Democratic governor, Abigail Spanberger, repealed a former directive that had enforced law enforcement cooperation with immigration officials.
“Sanctuary cities” generally refer to locales that limit cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), but there isn’t a specific legal definition for the term.
While this memo is unusual, it stops short of immediately withholding funds. It emphasizes that this is a data-gathering exercise, not a funding freeze. Despite this, Trump asserted during a news conference that funding would indeed be halted.
The memo instructs federal agencies to report detailed information by January 28 about federal money flowing to states like California, New York, and New Jersey. These states, governed and legislated largely by Democrats, often attract attention for their sanctuary policies.
Recent trends show a growing concern over federal funds allegedly being misused. In a previous attempt, the Trump administration tried to pause funds for childcare subsidies in select states, citing potential fraud. However, a judge intervened and paused that action.
The memo covers a broad range of federal funding streams, asking for details on grants, loans, and financial support for local governments and educational institutions within these states. It excludes funds meant for individuals, like student aid.
This ongoing situation highlights the complexities of federal and state interactions around immigration and funding. With increasing scrutiny on financial transactions and local policies, this may lead to further debates about federal resources and how they are distributed.
For more details about sanctuary cities and related policies, check out resources from the Migration Policy Institute.
Source link
Donald Trump, District of Columbia, Government budgets, Vermont, Virginia, Minnesota, General news, MD State Wire, Illinois, CT State Wire, MN State Wire, IL State Wire, Send to Apple News, Maryland, DC Wire, Connecticut, Massachusetts, CO State Wire, AP Top News, Colorado, California, Government policy, Washington news, United States government, Politics, U.S. news, Abigail Spanberger, Education, Immigration, Glenn Youngkin
