Trump Administration Sets Its Sights on Scientists Driving Critical Climate Assessment: What You Need to Know

Admin

Trump Administration Sets Its Sights on Scientists Driving Critical Climate Assessment: What You Need to Know

President Donald Trump’s administration has recently let go of nearly 400 contributors linked to a critical U.S. climate study. This study, known as the sixth National Climate Assessment (NCA6), helps federal and local governments prepare for climate change. An email announcing the dismissals raised questions about the project, which is set for publication in 2028.

Microsoft 365 subscription banner - starting at

The NCA6 has been guided by the Global Change Research Program. This group coordinates input from 14 federal agencies and numerous external scientists. The last assessment revealed that climate change is increasingly affecting Americans, driving up costs for essentials like weather-related insurance and healthcare.

An interesting aspect of this situation is the law that initiated these climate assessments: the Global Change Research Act of 1990. Interestingly, it was signed into law by Republican President George H.W. Bush. The current administration’s changes to the NCA raise concerns about the future integrity and usefulness of this critical report.

According to a 2023 report, climate change is becoming more expensive for Americans as it leads to higher costs in various areas, from food to healthcare. The rise in extreme weather events further complicates matters, impacting everything from agriculture to infrastructure.

Trump’s administration has targeted scientific research as part of broader budget cuts, aiming to reduce what it considers wasteful spending. This practice has affected multiple agencies, including the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. A right-wing policy framework known as Project 2025 has influenced many of these decisions, advocating for greater scrutiny of contributors to the climate assessment.

Many experts believe that dismissing scientists from such critical studies is a dangerous move. Dr. Jane Goodall, a prominent conservationist, has warned that neglecting scientific findings can have dire consequences for future generations. The public reaction on social media reflects growing concern. Many users are voicing worries about the lack of attention to climate issues, emphasizing that science should guide policy-making.

In times of increasing climate-related challenges, the need for comprehensive research and transparent decision-making has never been more crucial. As the situation develops, it will be essential to monitor how these changes impact climate policy and funding priorities in the U.S.

You can read more about the ongoing climate issues and government policies at reliable sources like the National Geographic or the EPA’s climate change page.

Source link

U.S., Republicans, Donald Trump, climate change, environment