“Trump Administration Urges Appeals Court to Halt Order on Immigration Arrests Without Probable Cause” | CNN Politics

The Trump administration recently requested a federal appeals court to pause a California judge’s order concerning immigration arrests. This ruling, issued by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong, requires that immigration officials have “reasonable suspicion” before making arrests. This means they can’t rely solely on factors like race, language, or location.

This order applies specifically to seven counties in California, including Los Angeles. The Justice Department argues that Frimpong exceeded her authority. They claim her ruling represents a “judicial takeover” of executive policies, which they feel should not be dictated by a district judge.

In their appeal, DOJ attorneys emphasized that such a ruling could disrupt the operations of federal immigration enforcement. They are asking for a temporary stay of the order while the case moves forward.

The ACLU of Southern California, which supported the case, is opposing the administration’s request for a pause. They argue that the Department of Homeland Security has engaged in unconstitutional arrests, hindering individuals’ rights to legal representation.

This situation highlights an ongoing debate about immigration enforcement in the U.S. Experts point out that the balance of power between branches of government is often tested in high-stakes legal cases like these. A recent survey showed that 61% of Americans are concerned about how immigration policies impact civil rights, reflecting a growing call for reform in the system.

The conversation around immigration touches on deeper issues of justice and human rights, showing that this is more than just a legal battle; it’s about how we treat individuals in vulnerable situations.

For more on this topic, you can check out additional coverage from CNN.

Source link