Trump Challenges Harvard: Threatens $3 Billion Funding Cut Over University Policies

Donald Trump recently intensified his campaign against Harvard University, threatening to cut $3 billion in federal grants. He expressed this on his Truth Social platform, suggesting the funds could instead support trade schools in the U.S., calling it a necessary investment.

In another post, he criticized some of Harvard’s international students, referring to them as “radicalized lunatics.” He demanded that Harvard provide lists of these students to assess who might pose a risk to the country.

This attack follows a Boston judge’s temporary ruling that blocked Trump’s administration from preventing Harvard from enrolling international students. In response, Harvard emphasized the importance of its global student body, stating, “Without its international students, Harvard is not Harvard.”

Alan Garber, the president of Harvard, condemned Trump’s threats as “unlawful and unwarranted,” maintaining that the university had complied with all legal requests from the government.

It’s noteworthy that recent surveys show the significant economic impact of international students in the U.S. For example, according to the Institute of International Education, in 2021, international students contributed over $38 billion to the U.S. economy. This data highlights how vital these students are, not just to institutions like Harvard, but to the broader economy.

As discussions continue, reactions on social media reflect a mix of support and opposition to Trump’s stance. Many users are debating the implications of such actions on academic freedom and international collaboration.

Trump’s rhetoric also recalls historical episodes where higher education institutions faced political pushback. During the McCarthy era, suspicion toward various groups led to significant changes in university policies. Today, the stakes remain high as universities navigate both academic integrity and government pressures.

As this story evolves, it raises important questions about the future of higher education in America, the role of international students, and the implications of political rhetoric on academic freedom.



Source link