Gavin Newsom’s recent attempts to regain control of the California National Guard faced a quick setback. A federal appeals court intervened, putting a pause on his plans. Just hours after a federal judge ordered the Guard to return to Newsom, the court issued a stay, allowing former President Trump to keep his grip on the troops for now.
The legal back-and-forth unfolded after Newsom sought to regain control of the California National Guard, which was federalized by Trump in response to protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids in Los Angeles. Judge Charles Breyer determined that Trump overstepped his authority by deploying the Guard without proper consultation with California officials.
During a brief press conference, Newsom expressed relief when it seemed he could reclaim the Guard. He regarded the situation as a test of democracy and criticized Trump’s management of the crisis. “This is what Donald Trump does,” Newsom said. “He creates a problem, then tries to play the hero.”
Trump, meanwhile, claimed credit for preventing chaos in Los Angeles, asserting that without his intervention, the city would be in turmoil. His remarks sparked a wave of criticism on social media, with many users questioning his narrative and pointing out that the protests were primarily peaceful.
The tension reached a peak as approximately 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines were stationed in downtown LA, enforcing a dusk-to-dawn curfew. Mayor Karen Bass emphasized the need for freedom and tolerance, stating, “No matter what happens out of the White House, we will always uphold our Constitution.”
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has scheduled a hearing to discuss the matter further. The ongoing conflict reveals a growing division over how the federal government and state authorities manage civil unrest and immigration issues. Experts suggest that this legal battle reflects a bigger trend of power struggles between state and federal governments, especially regarding immigration and civil rights.
This evolving scenario isn’t just a legal issue; it’s a reflection of broader public sentiments. A survey conducted in Los Angeles revealed that 61% of residents disapprove of Trump’s handling of immigration policies while favoring local oversight in dealing with such matters.
As debates on social media continue, this story serves as a reminder that civic engagement and the fight for rights remain at the forefront of American politics. For further reading on the implications of military presence in civilian areas, you can check out insights from the American Civil Liberties Union on civil rights and public safety.
Source link
Donald Trump,Gavin Newsom,immigration,LAPD,Los Angeles,National Guard