Trump Seeks Recognition as Two African Nations Sign Landmark Peace Deal – Can Lasting Peace Be Achieved?

A peace deal was signed in Washington D.C. on Friday between the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Rwanda, aimed at ending violence fueled by the M23 militia, allegedly backed by Rwanda. The agreement was signed under the watchful eye of U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who called it a significant moment after decades of conflict.

However, doubts linger. Many wonder if the agreement can truly bring peace, especially since the militia has not committed to disarming. In a tweet, former President Trump expressed optimism, labeling it a “great day for Africa and the world.” Yet, he also questioned whether he would receive credit for this or future peace efforts.

The DRC’s eastern region is rich in minerals but has suffered from violence, with over 7,000 deaths and a million people displaced since January, as reported by the NRC. Activists like Daniel Kubelwa highlight that the issues stem from historical tensions, going back to colonial borders and the aftermath of the Rwandan genocide in 1994, which continue to fuel division and violence.

Reports indicate that the M23 group aims to reclaim control over mineral-rich areas, often seeking to represent the interests of Rwandan Tutsis in the DRC. The United Nations has raised concerns about Rwanda’s support for the M23, claiming its forces cross into the DRC to assist the militia. This has led to further distrust and escalating tensions.

A recent UN report indicated that illicit mineral exports from the DRC to Rwanda have occurred, clouding the waters of any potential economic cooperation that might follow this peace agreement. Rwandan President Paul Kagame faced criticism last year for acknowledging that Rwanda serves as a transit point for DRC’s minerals, which many view as theft disguised as trade.

The peace accord includes provisions aimed at restoring stability, such as disarming non-state armed groups and facilitating humanitarian access. However, the DRC foreign ministry remains cautious, noting that the country’s ongoing issues require broader dialogue and reform.

Human rights experts and activists express skepticism about the accord’s effectiveness. Nobel laureate Denis Mukwege called the deal “vague” and biased toward Rwanda. He voiced concerns that it legitimizes Rwanda’s aggression and reinforces an unfair economic landscape, where the Congolese people do not benefit from their nation’s vast resources.

As the DRC seeks to stabilize, analysts warn that without addressing the root causes of the conflict—like wealth inequality and weak governance—any peace achieved may only be temporary. Kubelwa believes that true peace requires accountability, governance reform, and a dialogue that includes all voices, not just those in power.

As this situation evolves, many in the Congolese community remain hopeful yet cautious, understanding that peace is a fragile pursuit dependent on sincere efforts from both local and international actors.



Source link