US President Donald Trump recently signed an executive order aimed at changing how federal elections are run. This includes requiring voters to show proof of citizenship and limiting mail-in ballot deadlines for states.
Experts worry that these changes could disenfranchise millions of Americans. Many people lack easy access to the necessary documents like passports or birth certificates, which could prevent them from voting. The order brings into question how enforceable it will be, as states have the power to set their own election rules, and it’s likely to face legal challenges.
During the signing at the White House, Trump stated, “Election fraud. You’ve heard the term. We’re going to end it, hopefully." He claimed that the order would help address what he sees as shortcomings in election security. The document accuses the US of not enforcing basic election protections and threatens states with loss of federal funding if they don’t comply with proof of citizenship rules.
It’s important to note that it is already illegal for non-citizens to vote in federal elections, thanks to the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996. States are currently required to use a registration form that confirms citizenship under penalty of perjury, but this doesn’t require documentary evidence.
In terms of data, a report from the Brennan Center for Justice found that cases of illegal voting by non-citizens are extremely rare. Additionally, the new order would prevent states from counting mail-in ballots received after Election Day—a move that could affect many voters. Currently, 18 states allow such ballots as long as they are postmarked by Election Day.
Trump has often been accused of spreading misinformation surrounding elections. He has claimed that millions of illegal immigrants voted in past elections and continues to dispute his loss to Joe Biden in 2020.
Attempts to pass voter ID laws in Congress haven’t succeeded in the past. Critics point to statistics showing that a significant number of Americans lack the required ID, such as enhanced driver’s licenses or passports. Wendy Weiser, from the Brennan Center, highlighted that the president cannot simply override existing laws that govern voter registration.
UCLA law professor Rick Hasen mentioned in his blog that elections are primarily managed by state governments. He warned that if this order is upheld, it would shift significant power from the states to the federal government, raising concerns about the implications for state sovereignty in managing their own elections.
Understanding the social implications of these changes is crucial. Many Americans are expressing their concerns online, with social media discussions revealing strong divisions on the issue of voter ID laws and election integrity. As we move forward, it will be critical to see how this order plays out in courts and its potential impact on voters across the nation.
For more in-depth analysis, you can check out the Brennan Center for Justice, which offers a range of reports and expert opinions on voting rights and election integrity.
Check out this related article: US Vice President JD Vance Sets Off for a Greenland Getaway with His Wife This Friday
Source link