Trump Warns: Hamas Must Disarm or Face Forceful Action – What This Means for Global Security

Donald Trump recently commented on Hamas, saying they will need to disarm following a new peace deal aimed at ending the ongoing war in Gaza. He stated, “If they don’t disarm, we will disarm them, and it will happen quickly and perhaps violently. But they will disarm.” He mentioned this should occur within a reasonable timeframe.

As a ceasefire brokered by Trump is set to take effect, there are still many unknowns. One major question is how the U.S. plans to urge Hamas to disarm and possibly leave Gaza when the next phase of his peace plan rolls out.

Interestingly, Trump hinted that Hamas might still play a role in maintaining order in the short term. This has led to speculation about the U.S. approach to achieving a lasting peace that prevents both Hamas and Israel from reigniting the conflict.

Recently, Hamas released a video showing their members executing individuals labeled as “collaborators and outlaws.” This action seems to be part of an effort to target gangs in Gaza, especially after the ceasefire agreement with Israel.

On Air Force One, Trump acknowledged that Hamas would have a limited responsibility in ensuring security while the second phase of the peace agreement is worked out. Yet, his initial peace plan clearly calls for Hamas to disarm and drop any aspirations of controlling Gaza. Trump remarked, “[Hamas] are standing because they do want to stop the problems, and they’ve been open about it.”

Rebuilding Gaza will be challenging, according to Trump, who emphasized the need for cooperation with ground forces. He indicated that while phase two of the peace deal has “started,” its elements would unfold gradually. Trump pointed out, “You look at Gaza – it needs a lot of cleanup.”

These comments followed a significant meeting between U.S. envoys and Hamas leaders. This was the first official meeting since a past discussion in Doha. During the latest 45-minute meeting, the U.S. envoy expressed that the hostages held by Hamas were more of a burden than a benefit and mentioned the necessity for a hostage exchange.

This add-on to the conversation about U.S.-Hamas relations is not just about immediate security but poses questions about long-term strategies for peace. Various Middle Eastern leaders have been involved in these discussions, indicating a broader interest in the region’s stability.

Recent surveys reveal that many Americans are deeply concerned about the ongoing conflict, reflecting a desire for a sustainable peace. Public sentiment shows a clear preference for diplomatic efforts over military interventions, suggesting that many view these negotiations as crucial in potentially reshaping the future of U.S. relations in the Middle East.

For more insights into the complexities of the Gaza ceasefire deal, check this related article.

Source link