The Trump administration is stepping into the spotlight with its new executive order on artificial intelligence (AI). This order, signed on December 11, 2025, aims to challenge state laws that regulate AI, creating a stir across the political landscape.
At the heart of the order is the creation of an “AI Litigation Task Force” within the Justice Department. This team will tackle state laws that the administration finds burdensome. Additionally, the order instructs the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to align with the White House’s AI strategy to sidestep what they deem “onerous” regulations.
Trump emphasized the need for unity in the AI sector, pointing out China’s straightforward approach under President Xi. He remarked, “China is unified because they have one vote… That’s the end of that.”
David Sacks, an AI advisor to Trump, clarified that while the administration will push against some state regulations, they do support laws that protect children. “We’re not pushing back on that,” he noted, highlighting a careful balancing act between promoting AI freedom and ensuring safety.
However, experts are already predicting legal challenges to this executive order. Critics argue that restricting state regulation like this requires a congressional law. The administration, aware of potential backlash, plans to collaborate with Congress to draft a broader legislative framework.
The order received criticism not just from opponents but also from within Trump’s supporter base. Michael Toscano, director of the Family First Technology Initiative, voiced disappointment, arguing that the administration is missing a critical chance to engage voters on a pressing issue. “It doesn’t make sense for a populist movement to cut its base out of this vital conversation,” he said.
Some experts, like Adam Billen of Encode, warn that the order creates a chilling effect. States may hesitate to enact protective measures, fearing legal attacks from the federal government. “It’s about creating uncertainty, giving companies more leeway,” he cautioned.
As Congress continues to stall on comprehensive AI regulations, various states have already passed laws addressing AI-related issues. For example, some states now ban creating non-consensual images using AI and require transparency about AI usage by government agencies and businesses. This state-level activity reflects a growing recognition of the need for safeguards amidst rapid technological advancements.
Interestingly, this push for deregulation comes alongside recent debates about AI’s influence in international competition, particularly with China. Some analysts warn that easing restrictions too much could undermine the U.S.’s competitive edge in the AI race. Critics argue that selling advanced AI chips to China could particularly dilute American advantages.
The political division surrounding AI regulation continues to deepen. While Democrats generally favor more stringent regulations, Republicans are split; some align with tech industry leaders while others remain skeptical of their motives. This division could affect future legislation and the effectiveness of the executive order.
Overall, this order marks a significant moment in the ongoing debate about AI regulation in America. As stakeholders across the spectrum respond, the conversation will likely evolve, highlighting the balance between innovation, safety, and regulatory frameworks.
