President Donald Trump has taken a significant step by ordering the U.S. to withdraw from 66 international organizations. This includes several major U.N. agencies and other key bodies focused on global issues.
Recently, Trump signed an executive order directing U.S. departments to end their funding and participation in 31 U.N. groups and 35 non-U.N. organizations, as soon as possible. These organizations work on critical topics like climate change, human rights, and international security.
Key Withdrawals
Among the notable U.N. agencies the U.S. will no longer support are:
- The UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC): Central to global climate negotiations.
- UN Women: Focused on gender equality and women’s rights.
- The UN Population Fund (UNFPA): Addresses issues related to reproductive health.
- The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN): Important for environmental protection efforts.
Other significant withdrawals include groups like:
- The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): The leading authority on climate science, awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007.
Reasons Behind the Withdrawal
Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated that some institutions were working against the U.S. interests. Many of these organizations have been labeled “woke” by the administration, particularly those focused on climate and social policies.
This move is part of a larger trend. Trump previously withdrew the U.S. from the Paris Agreement on climate change, the World Health Organization (WHO), and UNESCO. Recently, the U.S. also cut funding for agencies like UNRWA, which assists Palestinians.
Impact on International Relations
The withdrawal from these organizations signals a shift away from multilateral cooperation. Experts express concern that this could strain relationships with allies and reduce the U.S.’s influence on global issues. A recent survey showed that 68% of Americans believe international collaboration on issues like climate change is essential for future generations.
Domestic Energy Policy
This decision coincides with Trump’s strong support for fossil fuels. He previously dismissed climate change as a “hoax” and emphasized a return to traditional energy sources. On a recent social media post, he claimed that Venezuela was set to export millions of barrels of oil to the U.S., following U.S. military actions there.
By stepping back from these international commitments, Trump is reshaping the U.S.’s role on the world stage. This could have lasting effects on global cooperation in tackling pressing issues like climate change and human rights.
In summary, Trump’s withdrawal from these organizations reflects a broader strategy to prioritize U.S. interests. How this plays out in both domestic and global contexts will be crucial in the coming months.
