On January 29, two significant executive orders related to education were issued by the Trump administration, sparking swift backlash from educators and advocates for church-state separation.
The first order, titled “Expanding Educational Freedom and Opportunity for Families,” encourages the use of federal funds for school vouchers across the country. This move, supporting a “school choice” initiative, could pave the way for private religious schools to receive public funding.
The second order, “Ending Radical Indoctrination in K-12 Schooling,” resonates with conservative evangelicals who argue that public schools promote a “woke” agenda and a leftist viewpoint to students.
Both orders strongly appeal to Trump’s supporters but also highlight the concerns of his critics. The first order outlines a plan for government agencies to identify funding and strategies to support K-12 educational choice.
Historically, attempts to channel taxpayer dollars into private schools have faced legal challenges due to church-state separation issues. However, a more conservative Supreme Court may allow such practices to gain traction. Recently, the court agreed to review a case from Oklahoma that seeks to provide taxpayer funding to a private religious charter school, a first for the nation.
Amanda Tyler, director of the Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty, criticized the school choice order. She stated, “This executive order seeks to divert taxpayer money from public schools to private institutions, including religious schools. Public education is vital because it guarantees students’ rights, including freedom of religion.”
Tyler added, “Public funds should serve public interests. Taxpayers shouldn’t be forced to support any religion.” She emphasized that religious education should be funded through voluntary contributions within religious institutions, rather than federal funds.
“Public schools are crucial for ensuring the civil rights of all students.”
The second executive order spans over 2,300 words and critiques “woke” ideologies. It expresses a desire to instill “patriotic admiration for our nation” in students, while denouncing “anti-American” and “false ideologies.” The order calls for public schools to remove discussions around gender identity, racial history, and the concept of “white privilege.”
Despite its intentions, there seems to be confusion regarding how Trump might enforce funding conditions, as Congress typically allocates education funding rather than the president. Furthermore, the order promotes “patriotic education measures” in public schools without explicit guidelines on implementation.
Americans United for Separation of Church and State responded, describing the attempts to reshape public schools as reminiscent of oppressive regimes. Rachel Laser from AU remarked, “Public schools are essential to our democracy and community. We must teach students a truthful account of our history, both good and bad.”
According to Laser, Trump’s order threatens to turn public education into “re-education camps,” promoting a narrow view of history and values that aligns with Christian nationalism. She expressed concerns that this would undermine the principle of church-state separation.
Transgender rights advocates also condemned the executive orders. Rodrigo Heng-Lehtinen, from Advocates for Trans Equality, stated that the administration’s stance promotes bullying instead of compassion in schools. He shared fears that this could make school environments hostile for transgender students, complicating their already difficult experiences.
In conclusion, both executive orders are anticipated to face legal challenges, as they raise significant concerns regarding public education and civil rights.
Related articles:
Supreme Court will hear Oklahoma charter school case
I will not hide | Opinion by Chelsea Hopkins
Democracy Forward succeeds in blocking Trump’s defunding of federal grants
