The U.S. military recently launched another strike in the Caribbean Sea, targeting a boat with survivors aboard. This marks the sixth known incident in the area since last month. While previous strikes focused on vessels suspected of carrying drugs, this is the first to involve survivors.
At least 27 people have died in earlier attacks, according to administration reports. President Trump has publicly linked these vessels to drug smuggling, referring to those killed as “narcotraffickers.” He emphasized that any ship loaded with drugs is a target.
Some lawmakers are raising concerns. They argue the administration should seek Congress’s approval before these military actions and that evidence for drug trafficking remains insufficient. The strikes coincide with a broader military presence in the Caribbean, as the U.S. increases pressure on Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, whom they accuse of colluding with drug cartels.
The U.S. has deployed eight warships, fighter jets, and around 10,000 troops to the region. Recently, B-52 bombers were seen flying close to the Venezuelan coast. Trump also confirmed covert CIA operations in Venezuela, citing issues with drugs and migration. He mentioned that Maduro is feeling intense pressure.
Maduro, however, denies any links to drug trafficking. He claims the U.S. is attempting to instigate regime change in Venezuela. Earlier in the week, he suggested he might declare a state of emergency due to perceived American aggression and has granted himself more powers to counter any U.S. attack.
In the bigger picture, this situation mirrors past U.S. military involvements in Latin America, often rooted in drug-related issues. The effectiveness and legality of these actions continue to be debated, highlighting the complex interplay between national security and international law.
For further insights, check out recent statistics from the U.N. Office on Drugs and Crime.