Big Oil is in hot water as lawsuits pile up due to worsening extreme weather. California is leading the charge, pushing for fossil fuel companies to pay billions for the climate destruction they’ve long downplayed.
All around the U.S., states, cities, and environmental groups are filing numerous lawsuits against oil companies. The main claim? These companies misled the public about the dangers of their products, knowing all along that fossil fuels contribute to climate change.
This strategy is reminiscent of legal battles from the 1990s when states took on tobacco companies for hiding the dangers of smoking. Back then, four major companies ended up paying billions to support anti-smoking campaigns and face ongoing financial obligations as long as they sold cigarettes. This set a powerful example for holding industries accountable for harmful practices.
Benjamin Franta, a climate law expert at the University of Oxford, emphasizes that these climate cases highlight deliberate deception. Unlike past climate lawsuits that focused on environmental regulations, these cases shift the focus squarely onto the companies themselves, potentially leading to high financial penalties.
However, unlike tobacco, the oil industry enjoys significant backing from government policies that encourage fossil fuel use. Michael Gerrard, an environmental law expert, points out that no court has yet held fossil fuel companies financially responsible for greenhouse gas emissions. This raises doubts about the success of these ongoing lawsuits.
Oil companies argue that blaming them for climate change is unfair, as it essentially casts them as responsible for the entire economy reliant on their products. This defense has gained traction in some courts, making the issue of liability complex as it involves a long supply chain that includes not just producers but also consumers.
Despite strong scientific connections between fossil fuels and climate change, linking specific fuel use to particular extreme weather events remains challenging. Ongoing climate liability efforts are seeing some success in California, particularly after severe wildfires in Los Angeles spurred new legislation. State Senator Scott Wiener introduced a bill allowing homeowners to sue oil companies for climate-related damages.
A significant moment occurred in a climate lawsuit in Hawaii, where the U.S. Supreme Court recently allowed cases against oil companies to move forward. The city of Honolulu filed suit against several major oil firms, seeking damages related to climate change effects.
While the oil industry and 20 states sought to dismiss the case, many view this as a crucial battleground. Legal experts warn that if the plaintiffs achieve a significant victory, it may pressure the oil companies to settle more cases. But, as various legal strategies unfold, the oil industry might ultimately seek to challenge these cases in higher courts.
Despite their progress, plaintiffs face challenges as the oil industry pushes these cases into federal courts, where judges have historically been more inclined to dismiss them. California is at the forefront of climate litigation, with Attorney General Rob Bonta filing suit against multiple oil giants for allegedly misinforming the public about climate change.
If successful, California’s legal efforts could reshape accountability for fossil fuel companies much like the tobacco cases did in the past. Bonta’s coordinated approach with multiple jurisdictions highlights the widespread impact of climate-related damages in the state.
As these cases unfold, strong evidence suggests that oil companies have misled the public about climate change for decades. Internal documents point to their awareness of the negative impact of fossil fuels from as early as the 1960s. Yet, as the scientific consensus grew stronger over the years, these companies actively spread confusion about climate change.
In Oregon, a lawsuit against ExxonMobil specifically targets the 2021 heatwave’s effects, seeking damages and a substantial fund for climate mitigation efforts. Wildfires present a unique challenge since they often result from identifiable parties, complicating the attribution of liability to oil companies.
Amid the shifting landscape of climate litigation, experts suggest that the insurance industry faces a crisis due to increasing climate-related risks. As insurers retreat from high-risk areas, they have shown reluctance to confront the fossil fuel industry driving these disasters. If oil companies are found liable for their role in climate change, it could lead to significant upheaval in the market.
Check out this related article: How Greta Thunberg’s Childhood Sparked a Global Movement for Climate Action
Source link