By GARRY RAYNO, InDepthNH.org
CONCORD — A recent push by STEM students for expanded educational programs faced pushback from lawmakers. Some called for a reduction of STEM options in the state’s core curriculum.
Students from the Academy of Science and Design and Nashua’s FIRST Phoenix robotics team voiced their concerns to the House Education Policy and Administration Committee. They argued that STEM education is crucial for the future of young people and the state’s progress.
However, Rep. Dan McGuire, R-Epsom, suggested removing subjects like arts, world languages, engineering, technology, and computer sciences from the state’s educational requirements. His proposal, House Bill 283, would also eliminate certain social studies topics and the newly approved financial literacy requirement.
McGuire believes that with declining test scores, schools should focus more on essential subjects like reading, writing, math, and science rather than electives. He remarked, “You have to walk before you can run.”
On the other hand, Michael Bessette, an assistant superintendent, passionately criticized this perspective, comparing it to historical instances where governments suppressed creative expression. “This approach can undermine education,” he said. “Let’s be honest, you are doing this because you don’t want to pay for it, even if others value it.”
Opposition to the bill was strong. Nearly 30,000 people expressed their disagreement online, with fewer than 70 in support. Many parents threatened to leave the state over concerns that their children would lose access to music and arts.
Educators, artists, business representatives, and concerned citizens described the bill as detrimental. They argued that a well-rounded education is vital for emotional and cognitive development. “Education does not exist in a silo,” remarked Giana Gelsey from the Oyster River School Board.
Many pointed out that passing the bill could widen the achievement gap between wealthier and poorer school districts. With less emphasis on certain subjects, students in less affluent areas could lose significant educational opportunities.
McGuire insisted that schools could still teach these subjects if they choose, emphasizing that local school boards should have the discretion to decide their curricula. He noted that the current list of educational requirements was last updated in 2007.
Some committee members raised concerns about eliminating world languages. McGuire argued that mastering math is more practical than learning French, as it can help individuals manage finances better. “French is nice, but is it required?” he questioned.
Others voiced the importance of civics and history, stating that understanding critical topics is essential for participating in democracy. Rep. Wayne Burton, D-Durham, added that if this bill passed, it could prevent New Hampshire students from meeting university admissions criteria due to the lack of language requirements.
Former educator Mike Corkery noted that similar initiatives in other states led to reduced educational standards and fewer opportunities, especially for disadvantaged students. Kaitlin Bernier highlighted the risk of defunding public education, calling it an extreme agenda that benefits charter and private schools at the cost of the public system.
As discussions continued, Daniel Krace, another committee member, expressed his frustration. He emphasized that removing these subjects would limit student opportunities and critically harm their education. The committee did not make an immediate decision on the bill.
Garry Rayno may be reached at garry.rayno@yahoo.com.
Check out this related article: Explore Gov. Lee’s Vision for Tennessee in 2025: Key Priorities from Education to Agriculture
Source link