Wyoming is looking to use a new $50 billion federal rural health program creatively. Officials plan to stretch five years’ worth of grants into a long-term funding solution, aiming for lasting improvements in rural health, according to Stefan Johansson, the state’s health department director.
If the plan is approved, Wyoming could secure up to $28.5 million annually from the Rural Health Transformation Program. This money would go toward health scholarships and support for small hospitals and ambulance services.
Kevin Bennett, who leads the South Carolina Center for Rural and Primary Healthcare, called it a “wild idea.” He noted that the crucial step is whether federal regulators will accept Wyoming’s approach. If approved, this strategy could prove beneficial, but risks are involved.
The Rural Health Transformation Program was established by Congressional Republicans as a response to concerns about rural communities facing Medicaid cuts expected to reach nearly $1 trillion over the next decade. Since 2010, 152 rural hospitals across the U.S. have closed or reduced services, highlighting the urgent need for sustainable solutions.
Wyoming, with its small population of about 588,000, stands to receive $205 million in the first year. However, strict spending rules require states to use their grants by the end of the following fiscal year or risk redistributing unused funds to others.
In a bid to make the funding last, Wyoming plans to create a “perpetuity fund,” which Johansson argues counts as spending the money. This fund would allow the state to invest in areas that support health care for years to come. However, emails from the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) suggest some skepticism about whether this approach meets their guidelines.
Experts like Patrick Hardigan, dean of the College of Health Sciences at the University of Wyoming, support the idea. He believes this funding could offer long-term benefits by ensuring resources are available even after federal support ends.
The proposed fund would allocate about 41% of its annual distribution to help small hospitals with financial aid and up to 22% for scholarships aimed at developing a skilled workforce in nursing and emergency services.
While other states, like Kentucky, have proposed similar funds, none seem quite like Wyoming’s; most focus on short-term benefits rather than endless support. Bennett emphasized that creativity in these plans will be necessary, and individual states’ approaches will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis by the CMS.
The Wyoming House has already advanced the legislation. It looks like a promising step for rural health in the state, but whether it can fulfill its ambitious goals remains to be seen. The outcome will depend heavily on federal approval and clear regulations surrounding these funding strategies.
You can read more about this initiative here.
