WASHINGTON (AP) — Frustrated by the ongoing government shutdown and a lack of cooperation from Democrats, President Trump is again urging the Senate to get rid of the legislative filibuster. This tool requires 60 votes in the Senate to move most bills forward, making it a roadblock for both parties over the years.
Trump believes that removing the filibuster would help end the month-long shutdown. He stated on social media that it’s time for Republicans to use the “Nuclear Option” to eliminate this procedure. However, many Republican senators are against this idea. They worry that scrapping the filibuster could backfire when they find themselves in the minority.
Understanding the filibuster is key here. Unlike the House, the Senate allows senators to speak freely, including using extended speeches to delay legislation. It was introduced inadvertently in the early 19th century after Vice President Aaron Burr noted complications in the Senate’s rulebook. Filibusters today are less about dramatic speeches and more about signaling a refusal to support a bill, needing that 60-vote threshold to move forward.
Interestingly, while the filibuster still exists for most legislation, it’s already gone for nominations. In 2013, the Democratic-led Senate eliminated it for all positions except Supreme Court nominees. This move ignited a tumultuous cycle of “going nuclear” between parties. Republicans followed suit in 2017, removing it for Supreme Court confirmations.
So, why is the filibuster being discussed amid the shutdown crisis? With Republicans holding only 53 seats, they need support from Democrats to move any funding bills. Democrats are currently pushing for an extension of health care subsidies as part of these negotiations, which Republicans argue is too expensive for a short-term fix.
In this context, some Republicans, like Sen. Bernie Moreno of Ohio, have started to question whether it might be time to revisit the filibuster. The shutdown has created urgency, and some senators feel pressure to act quickly to reopen the government.
Despite Trump’s calls for change, many in the GOP, including Senate Majority Leader John Thune, affirm their support for keeping the filibuster. Thune stated that having this 60-vote requirement is essential for protecting the nation and promoting bipartisanship. This sentiment is echoed by veteran senators who have witnessed periods of both Democratic and Republican control in the Senate. Newer members also recognize the need for compromise, emphasizing that principles should remain intact even as power shifts.
The debate around the filibuster reveals the delicate balance of power in the Senate and the challenges of governance today. As the shutdown drags on, the future of this long-standing procedural rule remains uncertain, illustrating how political dynamics can shift rapidly.
For those looking to understand the historical significance of the filibuster, it’s worth noting that it has evolved greatly over the years. Initially thought of as a tool for extended debate, it has transformed into a weapon for partisan battles. According to a recent survey, 68% of Americans believe that the current legislative process is too slow and cumbersome, illustrating public dissatisfaction with how Congress operates. This dissatisfaction fuels the ongoing discussions about whether reforms are necessary to address the frustrations many feel.
As we watch these developments unfold, it’s clear the filibuster will remain a contentious issue in American politics.
Source link
Donald Trump, Mike Johnson, John Thune, U.S. Republican Party, Barack Obama, Mitch McConnell, Harry Reid, Joe Manchin, Neil Gorsuch, U.S. government shutdown, U.S. Democratic Party, General news, Congress, Rand Paul, District of Columbia, Courts, Kentucky, Politics, Bernie Moreno, Legislation, Aaron Burr, Kyrsten Sinema, Washington news, John Curtis, James Stewart
