In the Ecuadorean embassy in London, Julian Assange becomes a focal point, presenting a complex mix of identities—journalist, hacker, and controversial figure. While Assange speaks about journalism and democracy, the documentary we’re exploring tells a broader tale, using various voices to frame its narrative.
The film, originally titled “The War on Journalism,” contrasts how Assange and Wikileaks were perceived in the U.S. and Europe. In the U.S., it’s referred to as “The Six Billion Dollar Man,” hinting at the reported offer from the U.S. to the Ecuadorean government for his extradition. The story behind this is fresh and intriguing, showing Assange’s early days not as a well-oiled machine, but as a group of ambitious young people.
Early revelations from Wikileaks were shocking and often felt like a Hollywood script. Many think of it as a professional operation; however, the reality was different. Most of the team were in their twenties, navigating a dangerous landscape. Sigurdur Thordarson, a former associate, reflects on this naivety: “Getting into a fight with the Pentagon is risky.”
Assange’s impact was undeniable. He claimed that Wikileaks’ revelations would inspire others to report fearlessly. However, looking at today’s media landscape, that inspiration hasn’t fully translated into widespread fearless journalism. Instead, the risks of misinformation and declining trust in media have grown significantly. According to a 2021 Pew Research survey, about 53% of Americans believe that the media intentionally misleads the public, a sentiment that’s only deepened since Assange’s revelations.
The film also touches on Assange’s controversial legal history, including the allegations in Sweden that led to his fleeing there. Director Eugene Jarecki presents these events delicately, highlighting that the women involved had little control over the aftermath. Critics describe Assange as paranoid and arrogant, further complicating his legacy. This is important in understanding not only who he is but also why he elicits strong feelings across the board.
As the story of Wikileaks unfolds, it also intertwines with significant events like the Arab Spring and the rise of figures like Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump. It explores the interconnectedness of politics and media, as shown when Trump allegedly suggested to the CIA that they should kill Assange.
Viewers may find themselves questioning the film’s depth regarding threats to journalism. While it presents vivid stories, it also reminds us that the punishment of truth-tellers like Daniel Ellsberg is not new. The documentary could have explored more aspects of modern journalism’s struggles, particularly the role of social media in shaping narratives.
This film offers an insightful look at historical narratives, even if some themes may feel familiar. Assange’s situation may seem dated, yet the questions surrounding journalism, trust, and power remain ever-relevant in today’s world.
For further reading on these topics, you can check out Pew Research’s findings on media trust.
