Unpacking the Latest Stefon Diggs Contract: What It Means for Fans and the Team

Stefon Diggs recently signed a contract that has raised a few eyebrows in the sports world. Initially reported as a juicy three-year deal worth $69 million, that’s not the full story.

The actual numbers tell a different tale. According to SI.com’s Albert Breer, here’s what we know:

• Signing bonus: $12 million
• 2025 base salary: $2.9 million (fully guaranteed)
• Workout bonuses for 2025 and 2026: $200,000 each year
• Roster bonuses: Up to $3.4 million for 2025, which hinges on playing time
• For 2026 and 2027: Each year includes a base salary of $20.6 million, with several guaranteed amounts.

To hit the estimated $69 million, Diggs will need to make the Pro Bowl every year and rack up some impressive stats—like 100 receptions for 1,300 yards in 2025.

When we break it all down, the base value of the deal is around $63.5 million, not $69 million, and the total guaranteed amount is $22.6 million, not $26 million. This kind of setup hints at a strategy to make the contract appear more lucrative than it is.

Diggs is coming off a season riddled with injuries, including a torn ACL. With high rewards tied to performance, his contract could be seen as risky, both for him and the Patriots. If he misses games, he could lose up to $200,000 each time.

This contract follows a growing trend in the NFL where teams balance high potential earnings with performance-based structures. According to a recent survey by the NFL Players Association, over 70% of players are now negotiating bonuses tied to game performance and participation. This shift reflects a more calculated approach to player contracts, ensuring teams can pivot if needed.

Overall, the way the contract is structured gives the Patriots a chance to reassess their commitment based on Diggs’ performance and health over the next couple of seasons. It’s a reflection of how NFL contracts are evolving: high risk but potentially high reward.

For a full breakdown of Diggs’ contract details, check out the article on SI.com.

Source link