When rovers like *Spirit* get stuck in soft terrain on Mars, engineers back on Earth jump into action. They send commands to try to move the rover and save its mission. Unfortunately, *Spirit* couldn’t be freed. But this has led to better testing methods on Earth that could prevent similar problems in the future.
Engineers at the University of Wisconsin-Madison have found a flaw in how rovers are usually tested. This oversight leads to overly optimistic predictions about how these machines will behave on other planets.
Understanding how a rover moves across different surfaces, especially in low gravity, is crucial. For example, the Moon’s gravity is six times weaker than Earth’s. Traditionally, engineers create rover prototypes that are lighter to simulate this. They test these lightweight models in deserts to see how they move through sand.
However, researchers realized an essential factor was missing: how Earth’s gravity affects sand. Dan Negrut, a mechanical engineering professor, and his team discovered that sand here is more rigid and supportive compared to the “fluffier” surface on the Moon. This difference means rovers might struggle more on the Moon, as the sand shifts easily under their weight, causing them to lose traction.
“We need to think about how gravity affects both the rover and the sand to understand its performance better,” Negrut explains. Their findings were recently published in the *Journal of Field Robotics*.
This research came from a NASA project aiming to simulate the VIPER rover for a lunar mission. The team used a physics simulation engine called Project Chrono. This tool helps model how complex systems like rovers behave on sandy or soft surfaces.
During the simulation, they noticed differences between their results and the Earth-based tests, which led them to uncover the testing flaw. The insights gained from this study benefit not just NASA but also industries on Earth. Organizations use Chrono to understand how machinery operates in various conditions, from military vehicles to mechanical watches.
“It’s gratifying that our work helps tackle real engineering challenges,” Negrut says. “Creating software that aids NASA is a significant achievement for our lab.” The Chrono software is free and publicly available, making it accessible worldwide. The UW-Madison team continuously improves it with support from organizations like the National Science Foundation and NASA.
Negrut emphasizes the importance of ongoing innovation. “Since our work is open-source, there’s competition to keep up, which pushes us to enhance our software constantly.” This collaborative spirit ensures that their tools remain cutting-edge and relevant to both space exploration and everyday engineering problems.
Source link
Space Exploration; Mars; NASA; Moon; Computer Modeling; Virtual Reality; Computers and Internet; Markets and Finance



















