Unveiling Africa’s Nuclear Energy Future: Key Insights from Climate Activists’ Report – Stay Updated with EnviroNews

Twelve civil society organizations from Africa, Europe, and Russia have raised concerns about a troubling trend: more African countries are exploring nuclear energy as part of their energy solutions.

The report, titled “The alarming rise of false climate solutions in Africa – the nuclear energy misadventure,” is a response to the upcoming Bonn Climate Conference SB62 in Germany. It highlights efforts by nations like Angola, Egypt, and Nigeria to develop nuclear power, while South Africa remains the only country on the continent with an active nuclear power plant, operating since 1984.

The authors of the report argue against nuclear energy, asserting that it doesn’t align with the goal of a green, sustainable future. Makoma Lekalakala, a Goldman Prize winner, emphasizes that nuclear power cannot deliver the immediate solutions Africa needs to combat climate change and energy poverty. The report claims that nuclear initiatives could divert crucial funding from renewable energy projects, creating a barrier to sustainable development.

Recent statistics support this view: a major report from the Climate Policy Initiative found that 75% of Africa’s climate finance needs are currently unmet. Many existing funding efforts involve debt instruments, leaving little room for risky investments in nuclear energy.

Experts echo similar sentiments. Philip Jakpor of the Renewable Development Initiative warns that Nigeria lacks the infrastructure to handle nuclear energy safely. He points out that existing oil and gas systems are plagued with issues like sabotage and theft, making the added risk of nuclear energy a potential disaster.

In Ghana, the sentiment is echoed by Alberta Kpeleku of 360 Human Rights, who argues against nuclear power due to its risks associated with accidents and terrorism. She underscores the advantages of renewable energy sources like solar and wind.

Kenyan activist Phyllis Omido expresses solidarity with anti-nuclear movements, stating that nuclear energy could lead to “energy slavery.” She advocates for renewable energy as a means of liberation for African communities.

Looking at historical context, past nuclear initiatives in various countries show that the promise of quick energy solutions often leads to long-term issues, including environmental damage and health risks. In contrast, renewable energy developments can create jobs, improve public health, and foster energy independence.

Vladimir Slivyak, a member of the Russian environmental group Ecodefense, sums it up well: “Nuclear power is expensive, slow, and dangerous.” He reminds us that in an era of climate uncertainty, renewable energy stands out as the safer and more effective choice for Africa.

Ultimately, the case against nuclear energy is growing stronger. As nations grapple with energy shortages, the focus should shift to harnessing Africa’s abundant renewable resources, ensuring a sustainable and resilient future for all.



Source link

Africa,Climate activists,Nuclear energy