In early April, a surprising scene unfolded at a CIA archive in Washington. A team from Tulsi Gabbard’s office arrived unannounced, seeking classified files on the assassinations of Robert F. Kennedy, John F. Kennedy, and Martin Luther King Jr. This unexpected visit was a part of a mission to start the declassification process for these historical documents.
According to sources, the CIA was caught off guard by this sudden request. Gabbard’s team was adamant about their legal right to access these documents, going so far as to assert that anyone blocking their efforts could face consequences. The tensions were high, with reports of shouting at the archive entryway. However, others described the exchanges as professional amidst the pressure of a looming deadline.
The urgency stemmed from President Trump’s executive order in January, which instructed Gabbard—serving as Director of National Intelligence—to release these important records. This move was partly fueled by a long-standing skepticism among the American public regarding the official narratives of these notable assassinations. Recent surveys have shown that a significant portion of the population continues to believe in conspiracy theories surrounding these incidents, indicating a deep-rooted distrust in government explanations.
Polling data from Gallup shows that around 59% of Americans do not believe that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone in President Kennedy’s assassination. As new files are released—like the 80,000 Kennedy-related documents made public this March—questions persist. While some of the newly available documents provided more details about the CIA’s prior knowledge of Oswald, they did not challenge the long-accepted conclusion of a lone gunman.
Interestingly, social media trends reveal that discussions about these conspiracies remain rampant, especially among Trump’s supporters. The lure of mystery in these assassination cases fuels public curiosity and suspicion.
During their mission, Gabbard’s team was led by Paul Allen McDonald II, a Defense Intelligence Agency official. They worked late into the night to secure the transfer of documents to the National Archives. The cooperation from CIA personnel was noted, suggesting an acknowledgment that after 60 years, it was time to disclose this information.
In a recent cabinet meeting, Gabbard mentioned her team as “hunters” searching for the truth in the archives. This approach reflects a broader push for transparency in an era marked by growing skepticism of intelligence agencies.
Ultimately, while significant documents have been released, the history surrounding these assassinations continues to spark debate and speculation. The need for transparency in the intelligence community remains a vital topic as the public grapples with its trust in government narratives.
Source link
EREP,ANLINS,CLJ,CRIM,GEN,JUDIC,NEWS1,POL,POTUS,WASH,AMERS,US,NAMER,LEGAL,REUTERS-LEGAL,DEST:OUSTPM,DEST:OUSWDM,DEST:OUSDNM,DEST:OCATPM,PACKAGE:US-TOP-NEWS,PACKAGE:WORLD-NEWS,DEST:OUSPOM,PACKAGE:US-POLITICS,TOPNWS,TOPCMB



:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/VWH-GettyImages-642079562-efcd4810ace143d892a05da499c9e354.jpg?w=480&resize=480,480&ssl=1)








:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/health-benefits-of-spicy-food-GettyImages-1390848100-059ffe842d7947bd90b997099a544e37.jpg?w=480&resize=480,480&ssl=1)




