The new biopic “Michael,” directed by Antoine Fuqua, has drawn sharp criticism, especially from Dan Reed, director of the documentary “Leaving Neverland.” In that film, allegations of child sexual abuse against Michael Jackson by Wade Robson and James Safechuck were examined.
Reed argues that “Michael” misrepresents the truth. In an interview with Variety, he stated the film portrays the accusers as liars without expressing that clearly. He believes it lacks depth, saying Jackson is depicted as a “plastic action doll,” missing the complexities of his character and relationships. Reed emphasizes that the film overlooks Jackson’s troubling connections with children.
He suggests that the film simplifies uncomfortable truths, presenting Jackson’s affection for children as innocent and ignoring the more sinister implications. Reed points out that Jackson’s history with young boys—like sharing his bed—shouldn’t be brushed aside. He argues this would raise serious questions if anyone else were involved.
Fuqua, in an interview with the New Yorker, hinted that some accusations against Jackson may have racial undertones. He mentioned a disparity in how people react to similar behaviors from different stars, citing Elvis Presley’s early relationship with a 14-year-old.
Despite their differences, both Reed and Fuqua have made significant financial gains from their projects related to Jackson. Reed noted that accusations have not benefited Robson and Safechuck, as they have not profited from their experiences.
The biopic opened to impressive numbers, raking in $217 million globally during its debut weekend. Yet, reactions have been mixed. Jackson’s daughter, Paris, publicly criticized its narrative, saying it caters too much to certain fans’ fantasies.
User reactions on social media reflect a divided audience, with many feeling uncomfortable with how Jackson’s image is depicted. Reed encapsulates the controversy, stating the film distorts reality, making the impossible seem plausible.
As discussions about Jackson’s legacy continue, it’s clear that people have strong feelings about how his story should be told. The conversation around “Michael” highlights ongoing debates about fame, morality, and accountability in entertainment.
For a deeper dive into the film, you can read more in The Guardian’s review.
