For years, wormholes have captivated our imagination. We’ve pictured them as shortcuts through space and time. But a recent study flips this idea on its head. Instead of being gateways, these wormholes might actually reflect time itself.
This new perspective delves into a concept introduced by Albert Einstein nearly 90 years ago. It seeks to unite gravity with quantum mechanics, two major pillars of physics that often clash. Their conflict surfaces in extreme situations, like inside black holes or at the universe’s origin—the Big Bang.
The study highlights a long-misunderstood idea called the Einstein-Rosen bridge. In 1935, Einstein and his colleague Nathan Rosen formulated this bridge as a mathematical link between two identical spacetime models. Their goal? To ensure the equations describing particles and gravity stayed consistent.
Years later, the physics world reimagined this bridge as a wormhole, a tunnel connecting distant parts of the universe. Unfortunately, calculations showed these “tunnels” collapse too quickly to travel through. So, in conventional physics, these bridges remain unstable and unobservable.
Despite these challenges, the wormhole idea became a pop culture phenomenon. The recent study revisits Einstein and Rosen’s original problem by incorporating modern quantum theories, especially regarding time at tiny scales. The authors claim, “This new understanding of the Einstein-Rosen (ER) bridges is not related to classical wormholes….”
What’s fascinating is how most laws of physics remain unchanged whether time flows forward or backward. This symmetry is largely overlooked since we experience time as linear. Yet this study suggests that near black holes or in extreme cosmic scenarios, our one-directional view of time is incomplete. It proposes a more complex model, including both forward and backward time movement.
The new interpretation sees the Einstein-Rosen bridge not as a tunnel but as a mathematical link between these two time directions. This fresh view has significant implications, especially concerning the black hole information paradox. Stephen Hawking’s work showed that black holes emit radiation and can eventually vanish, seemingly erasing the information of what fell into them. This contradicts a key rule of quantum mechanics—that information must always be preserved.
In this new model, the information doesn’t vanish at the event horizon; instead, it continues to evolve in the time-reversed aspect of the quantum state. To us, it appears lost—yet fundamentally, nothing disappears, preserving the laws of quantum mechanics without needing radical changes to Einstein’s theory.
If this theory holds true, it could reshape our understanding of the universe. For instance, the Big Bang might not have marked the definitive start of time, but instead a ‘quantum bounce’—a transition between contracting and expanding universes, each with differing time directions.
This perspective implies that our universe could be inside a black hole from a previous universe. As this earlier cosmos collapsed, quantum effects might have prevented a singularity, allowing space and time to rebound and expand. Some remnants, like small black holes from that earlier period, could have survived and surfaced in our universe, potentially shedding light on dark matter.
However, this remains a theoretical notion. It doesn’t pave the way for wormholes, faster-than-light travel, or time machines. Testing these concepts will require innovative approaches to bridge quantum theory, cosmology, and observations of black holes and the universe’s origins.
The researchers aim to refine their mathematical framework and identify clearer observable signals that could support or challenge this intriguing vision.
You can read more about this study in the journal Classical and Quantum Gravity.
Source link
Albert Einstein, Big Bang, black hole, Space, Wormhole, wormholes
