Urgent Warning: EPA’s Proposed Rollback of Key Regulations Poses Risks to American Health, Say Environmental Experts

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently announced plans to roll back 31 regulations focused on climate, air, and water pollution. This could be one of the largest deregulatory actions in US history, as stated by EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin. He claims this move will lower living costs and boost American energy independence, suggesting it addresses a so-called “climate change religion.” In contrast, experts warn that loosening these regulations can harm public health.

This approach targets key findings from 2009 that linked climate change-causing pollutants, like methane and carbon dioxide, to human health risks. Without these protections, emitting these gases could become more widespread, raising significant health concerns. For instance, former EPA director Margo Oge cautioned that the resulting health issues and environmental damage could lead to increased costs for consumers.

Historical context is essential here. The Clean Air Act of 1970 established crucial air quality standards and has been linked to saving lives. According to research by the EPA, significant reductions in air pollution since the Act’s implementation have averted around 230,000 premature deaths in the US between 1990 and 2020. However, the current administration appears poised to weaken these critical protections.

Studies show that air pollution contributes to 5-10 million deaths annually worldwide, with increased cases of heart diseases and respiratory illnesses linked to particulate matter and ozone. Dr. Lynn Goldman, from the George Washington Milken School of Public Health, emphasized the strong connection between climate pollutants and health outcomes, pointing out that the science supporting health protections is more robust than ever.

As for water safety, the EPA’s administration also plans changes affecting the definition of “waters of the United States.” This could result in fewer protections for wetlands and streams, jeopardizing water quality. Environmental groups argue that removing these protections will lead to poorer drinking water and increased flooding risks.

Public reaction is mixed. Some industries celebrate the deregulatory efforts as a win, believing this will unleash American power and stimulate economic growth. Analysts note, however, that rising energy costs might counteract these benefits due to ongoing trade tariff impacts.

Many experts and environmental advocates worry these moves will undermine years of progress in public health and environmental protection. Significant legal challenges are anticipated as various groups aim to uphold the regulatory framework that has protected air and water quality for decades.

In essence, while the EPA promotes a vision of deregulation and cost reduction, the broader implications for public health and environmental safety deserve careful consideration as these policies unfold. Experts continue to urge a balance between industry needs and protecting the environment for future generations.



Source link